Affiliation:
1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
2. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center
Abstract
In this article, we build on and extend research into the cognitions and values of users and designers by proposing a systematic approach for examining the underlying assumptions, expectations, and knowledge that people have about technology. Such interpretations of technology (which we call technological frames) are central to understanding technological development, use, and change in organizations. We suggest that where the technological frames of key groups in organizations—such as managers, technologists, and users— are significantly different, difficulties and conflict around the development, use, and change of technology may result. We use the findings of an empirical study to illustrate how the nature, value, and use of a groupware technology were interpreted by various organizational stakeholders, resulting in outcomes that deviated from those expected. We argue that technological frames offer an interesting and useful analytic perspective for explaining an anticipating actions and meanings that are not easily obtained with other theoretical lenses.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Subject
Computer Science Applications,General Business, Management and Accounting,Information Systems
Reference103 articles.
1. Psychological status of the script concept;ABELSON R. P;Am. Psychol.,1981
2. AGAR M. H. 1980. The Professwnal Stranger: An In{brmal Introductzon to Ethnography. Academic Press New York. AGAR M. H. 1980. The Professwnal Stranger: An In{brmal Introductzon to Ethnography. Academic Press New York.
3. ARGYRIS C. AND SCHON D. 1978. Orgamzatwnal Learmng. Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs N.J. ARGYRIS C. AND SCHON D. 1978. Orgamzatwnal Learmng. Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs N.J.
4. Changing interpretive schemes and organizational restructuring: The example of a religious order;BARTUNEK J.;Adm. Scl. Q.,1984
Cited by
991 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献