Adapting Ethical Sensitivity as a Construct to Study Technology Design Teams

Author:

Boyd Karen L.1,Shilton Katie2

Affiliation:

1. University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA

2. University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, MD, USA

Abstract

The design of new technologies is a cooperative task (between designers on teams, and between designers and users) with ethical import. Studying technology development teams' engagement with the ethical aspects of their work is important, but engagement with ethical issues is an unobservable construct without agreement on what observable factors comprise it. Ethical sensitivity (ES), a construct studied in medicine, accounting, and other professions, offers a framework of observable factors by operationalizing ethical engagement in workplaces into component parts. However, ES has primarily been studied as a property of individuals rather than groups and in professions outside of computing. This paper uses a corpus of 108 ES studies from 1985-2020 to adapt the framework for studies of technology design teams. From the ES corpus, we build an umbrella framework that conceptualizes ES as comprising the moment of noticing an ethical problem (recognition), the process of building understanding of the situation (particularization), and the decision about what to do (judgment). This framework makes theoretical and methodological contributions to the study of how ethics are operationalized on design teams. We find that ethical sensitivity provides useful language for studies of collaboration and communication around ethics; suggests opportunities for, and evaluations of, ethical interventions for design workplaces; and connects team members' backgrounds, educational experiences, work practices, and organizational factors to design decisions. Simultaneously, existing research in HCI and CSCW addresses the limited range of research methods currently employed in the ES literature, adding rich, contextualized data about situated and embodied ethical practice to the theory.

Funder

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications,Human-Computer Interaction,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Reference105 articles.

1. [n.d.].P7000 - IEEE Draft Model Process for Addressing Ethical Concerns During System Design. https://standards.ieee.org/project/7000.html [n.d.].P7000 - IEEE Draft Model Process for Addressing Ethical Concerns During System Design. https://standards.ieee.org/project/7000.html

2. 2019.Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2019. https://insights.stackoverflow.com/survey/2019/?utm_source=social-share&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=dev-survey-2019 2019.Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2019. https://insights.stackoverflow.com/survey/2019/?utm_source=social-share&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=dev-survey-2019

3. Differences in research ethics judgments between male and female marketing professionals

4. Ali A Al-Kazemi and Gary Zajac. 1999. Ethics Sensitivity and Awareness Within Organizations in Kuwait: An Empirical Exploration of Espoused Theory and Theory-in-Use. (1999) 9. Ali A Al-Kazemi and Gary Zajac. 1999. Ethics Sensitivity and Awareness Within Organizations in Kuwait: An Empirical Exploration of Espoused Theory and Theory-in-Use. (1999) 9.

5. Scenario Co-Creation Cards

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. On defense of “ethification” of law: How ethics may improve compliance with the EU digital laws;Computer Law & Security Review;2023-09

2. Wrangling Ethical Design Complexity: Dilemmas, Tensions, and Situations;Designing Interactive Systems Conference;2023-07-10

3. Scaffolding Ethics-Focused Methods for Practice Resonance;Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference;2023-07-10

4. Designing Responsible AI: Adaptations of UX Practice to Meet Responsible AI Challenges;Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems;2023-04-19

5. Exploring the experience of ethical tensions and the role of community in UX practice;Nordic Human-Computer Interaction Conference;2022-10-08

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3