Affiliation:
1. MODUL University Vienna
Abstract
Paul Feyerabend was presumably one of the most controversial thinkers in scientific epistemology. A self-proclaimed proponent of epistemological anarchism, in his seminal book Against Method he fiercely criticized rationalist thinking, as represented by his friend Imre Lakatos. As a result, he found himself heavily under fire for allegedly propagating ideas related to anarchy, Voodoo, astrology, Dada, and even violence. At times he even admitted that he regretted having written his famous book in the first place.1 He has been labeled the "worst enemy of science" and is generally only briefly mentioned as a marginal note following the discussion of critical rationalism in philosophical textbooks. In this paper I argue that a thorough review of his thoughts and principles might provide interesting insights, discussions, and even research guidelines for the Information Systems(IS) community. Initially, I briefly introduce the philosopher Feyerabend and his key ideas together with some criticism. Next, three central propositions are distilled from his work and four experienced IS researchers express their opinions on these statements. Finally, I provide a short summary and some suggestions regarding epistemology and methodology in the IS field.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Subject
Computer Networks and Communications,Management Information Systems
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Jürgen Habermas Revisited via Tim Cook's Wikipedia Biography: A Hermeneutic Approach to Critical Information Systems Research;Journal of Responsible Technology;2024-08
2. Design science in entrepreneurship: Conceptual foundations and guiding principles;Journal of Business Venturing Design;2021-07
3. The Philosopher's Corner;ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems;2021-04-26
4. What's Next in Blockchain Research?;ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems;2021-01-22
5. Research Methods;Progress in IS;2021