How do Computer Science Students Make Decisions in Ethical Situations? Implications for Teaching Computing Ethics based on a Grounded Theory Study

Author:

Hedayati-Mehdiabadi Amir1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Organization, Information & Learning Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA

Abstract

The daily influence of new technologies on shaping and reshaping human lives necessitates attention to the ethical development of the future computing workforce. To improve computer science students’ ethical decision-making, it is important to know how they make decisions when they face ethical issues. This article contributes to the research and practice of computer ethics education by identifying the factors that influence ethical decision-making of computer science students and providing implications to improve the process. Using a constructivist grounded theory approach, the data from the text of the students’ discussion postings on three ethical scenarios in computer science and the follow-up interviews were analyzed. Based on the analysis, relating to real-life stories, thoughtfulness about responsibilities that come from the technical knowledge of developers, showing care for users or others who might be affected, and recognition of fallacies, contributed to better ethical decision-making. On the other hand, falling for fallacies and empathy for developers negatively influenced students' ethical decision-making process. Based on the findings, this study presents a model of factors that influence the ethical decision-making process of computer science students, along with implications for future researchers and computer ethics educators.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Education,General Computer Science

Reference64 articles.

1. Experiences in Discussing Ethics with Undergraduate Engineers

2. ACM Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct. Retrieved from https://www.acm.org/code-of-ethics.

3. Business as usual: The acceptance and perpetuation of corruption in organizations;Anand V.;The Academy of Management Executive,2004

4. A. Bandura. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc.

5. Moral Disengagement in the Perpetration of Inhumanities

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. "Not my Priority:" Ethics and the Boundaries of Computer Science Identities in Undergraduate CS Education;Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction;2024-04-17

2. Teaching Ethics in Computing: A Systematic Literature Review of ACM Computer Science Education Publications;ACM Transactions on Computing Education;2024-01-14

3. Teaching Multidimensional Ethical Decision-Making Through a Role-Play Case Study;2023 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE);2023-10-18

4. Designing Ethically-Integrated Assignments: It’s Harder Than it Looks;Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research V.1;2023-08-07

5. Incorporating Code Structure and Ethics into CS1-CS2 Assignments;Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 2;2023-08-07

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3