Evaluating Augmented Reality Communication: How Can We Teach Procedural Skill in AR?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Evaluating Augmented Reality Communication: How Can We Teach Procedural Skill in AR?

Published:2023-10-09 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:
Container-title:29th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Rebol Manuel¹^ORCID,Pietroszek Krzysztof²^ORCID,Sikka Neal³^ORCID,Ranniger Claudia⁴^ORCID,Hood Colton⁵^ORCID,Rutenberg Adam⁴^ORCID,Sasankan Puja⁶^ORCID,Gütl Christian⁷^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Graz University of Technology, Austria and American University, United States and George Washington University, USA

2. IDEAS Lab, American University, United States

3. Emergency Medicine, The George Washington University, United States

4. The George Washington University, United States

5. Department of Emergency Medicine, The George Washington University, United States

6. George Washington University, United States

7. CoDiS Lab Graz, Graz University of Technology, Austria

Funder

National Science Foundation

Publisher

ACM

Link

https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3611659.3615685

Reference46 articles.

1. Weronika Celniak and Piotr Augustyniak . 2022. Eye-Tracking as a Component of Multimodal Emotion Recognition Systems . In Information Technology in Biomedicine , Ewa Pietka, Pawel Badura, Jacek Kawa, and Wojciech Wieclawek (Eds.). Springer International Publishing , Cham , 66–75. Weronika Celniak and Piotr Augustyniak. 2022. Eye-Tracking as a Component of Multimodal Emotion Recognition Systems. In Information Technology in Biomedicine, Ewa Pietka, Pawel Badura, Jacek Kawa, and Wojciech Wieclawek (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 66–75.

2. Dragoş Datcu , Stephan Lukosch , and Frances Brazier . 2015. On the Usability and Effectiveness of Different Interaction Types in Augmented Reality . International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 31, 3 ( 2015 ), 193–209. Dragoş Datcu, Stephan Lukosch, and Frances Brazier. 2015. On the Usability and Effectiveness of Different Interaction Types in Augmented Reality. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 31, 3 (2015), 193–209.

3. Ryan Anthony de Belen , Huyen Nguyen , Daniel Filonik , Dennis Favero , and Tomasz Bednarz . 2019. A systematic review of the current state of collaborative mixed reality technologies: 2013–2018. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering 3 (05 2019 ), 181–223. https://doi.org/10.3934/ElectrEng.2019.2.181 10.3934/ElectrEng.2019.2.181 Ryan Anthony de Belen, Huyen Nguyen, Daniel Filonik, Dennis Favero, and Tomasz Bednarz. 2019. A systematic review of the current state of collaborative mixed reality technologies: 2013–2018. AIMS Electronics and Electrical Engineering 3 (05 2019), 181–223. https://doi.org/10.3934/ElectrEng.2019.2.181

4. Andreas Dünser Raphaël Grasset Hartmut Seichter and Mark Billinghurst. 2007. Applying HCI principles to AR systems design. (2007). Andreas Dünser Raphaël Grasset Hartmut Seichter and Mark Billinghurst. 2007. Applying HCI principles to AR systems design. (2007).

5. Revisiting collaboration through mixed reality: The evolution of groupware