From Anecdotal Evidence to Quantitative Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review on Evaluating Explainable AI

Author:

Nauta Meike1ORCID,Trienes Jan2ORCID,Pathak Shreyasi1ORCID,Nguyen Elisa3ORCID,Peters Michelle3ORCID,Schmitt Yasmin2ORCID,Schlötterer Jörg2ORCID,van Keulen Maurice3ORCID,Seifert Christin2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Twente, the Netherlands and University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany

2. University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany

3. University of Twente, the Netherlands

Abstract

The rising popularity of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) to understand high-performing black boxes raised the question of how to evaluate explanations of machine learning (ML) models. While interpretability and explainability are often presented as a subjectively validated binary property, we consider it a multi-faceted concept. We identify 12 conceptual properties, such as Compactness and Correctness, that should be evaluated for comprehensively assessing the quality of an explanation. Our so-called Co-12 properties serve as categorization scheme for systematically reviewing the evaluation practices of more than 300 papers published in the past 7 years at major AI and ML conferences that introduce an XAI method. We find that one in three papers evaluate exclusively with anecdotal evidence, and one in five papers evaluate with users. This survey also contributes to the call for objective, quantifiable evaluation methods by presenting an extensive overview of quantitative XAI evaluation methods. Our systematic collection of evaluation methods provides researchers and practitioners with concrete tools to thoroughly validate, benchmark, and compare new and existing XAI methods. The Co-12 categorization scheme and our identified evaluation methods open up opportunities to include quantitative metrics as optimization criteria during model training to optimize for accuracy and interpretability simultaneously.

Funder

Ziekenhuis Groep Twente

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

General Computer Science,Theoretical Computer Science

Reference307 articles.

1. Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)

2. Julius Adebayo, Justin Gilmer, Michael Muelly, Ian Goodfellow, Moritz Hardt, and Been Kim. 2018. Sanity checks for saliency maps. In Proceedings of the NeurIPS, Vol. 31. Curran Associates. Retrieved from https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2018/file/294a8ed24b1ad22ec2e7efea049b8737-Paper.pdf.

3. Julius Adebayo, Michael Muelly, Ilaria Liccardi, and Been Kim. 2020. Debugging tests for model explanations. In Proceedings of the NeurIPS.

4. Tameem Adel, Zoubin Ghahramani, and Adrian Weller. 2018. Discovering interpretable representations for both deep generative and discriminative models. In Proceedings of the ICML, Vol. 80. PMLR.

5. Auditing black-box models for indirect influence

Cited by 27 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3