FinerMe: Examining App-level and Feature-level Interventions to Regulate Mobile Social Media Use

Author:

Orzikulova Adiba1ORCID,Cho Hyunsung2ORCID,Chung Hye-Young3ORCID,Hong Hwajung1ORCID,Lee Uichin1ORCID,Lee Sung-Ju1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. KAIST, Daejeon, Republic of Korea

2. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

3. Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Many digital wellbeing tools help users monitor and control social media use on their smartphones by tracking and setting limits on their usage time. Tracking is typically done at the granularity of phone- or app-level; however, recent social media apps provide various features such as direct messaging, comment reading/posting, and content uploading/viewing. While it is possible to track and analyze within-app feature usage, little is known about the effect of granularity on smartphone interventions. We designed and developed FinerMe to explore how the granularity of interventions (app-level vs. feature-level) affects the usage of popular social media such as Instagram and YouTube on smartphones. We conducted a field study with 56 participants over 16 days that consisted of three phases: baseline collection, self-reflection, and self-reflection with restrictive interventions. The results showed that while both app-level and feature-level interventions similarly reduced social media use, feature-level interventions enabled users to spend less time on passive app features related to content consumption (e.g., following feed on Instagram, and viewing comments on YouTube) than app-level interventions. Moreover, when self-reflection is combined with restrictive interventions at the feature-level, users were more reflective on their usage behavior than when done at the app-level.

Funder

Institute of Information & communications Technology Planning & Evaluation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications,Human-Computer Interaction,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Reference77 articles.

1. Digital wellbeing tools through users lens

2. American Psychological Association. 2022. Active Control Trial. https://dictionary.apa.org/active-control-trial/. American Psychological Association. 2022. Active Control Trial. https://dictionary.apa.org/active-control-trial/.

3. Negative emotional and cognitive responses to being unfriended on Facebook: An exploratory study

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3