On the Semantic Difference of Judicial and Standard Language-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

On the Semantic Difference of Judicial and Standard Language

Published:2023-06-19 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:
Container-title:Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Behnke Gregor¹^ORCID,Wais Niklas²^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

2. Institute for Civil, Information, Data and Media Law, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany

Publisher

ACM

Link

https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3594536.3595123

Reference17 articles.

1. Fatemeh Torabi Asr Robert Zinkov and Michael Jones. 2018. Querying word embeddings for similarity and relatedness. In NAACL-HLT. 675--684. Fatemeh Torabi Asr Robert Zinkov and Michael Jones. 2018. Querying word embeddings for similarity and relatedness. In NAACL-HLT. 675--684.

2. Distributional Semantics and Linguistic Theory

3. U. Quasthoff D. Goldhahn T. Eckart. 2012. Building Large Monolingual Dictionaries at the Leipzig Corpora Collection: From 100 to 200 Languages. In LREC. 759--765. U. Quasthoff D. Goldhahn T. Eckart. 2012. Building Large Monolingual Dictionaries at the Leipzig Corpora Collection: From 100 to 200 Languages. In LREC. 759--765.

4. Yoav Goldberg and Omer Levy . 2014. word2vec Explained: deriving Mikolov et al.'s negative-sampling word-embedding method. arXiv:1402.3722 ( 2014 ). Yoav Goldberg and Omer Levy. 2014. word2vec Explained: deriving Mikolov et al.'s negative-sampling word-embedding method. arXiv:1402.3722 (2014).

5. Der blinde Fleck der deutschen Rechtswissenschaft – Zur digitalen Verfügbarkeit instanzgerichtlicher Rechtsprechung