A survey on service quality description

Author:

Kritikos Kyriakos1,Pernici Barbara2,Plebani Pierluigi2,Cappiello Cinzia2,Comuzzi Marco3,Benrernou Salima4,Brandic Ivona5,Kertész Attila6,Parkin Michael7,Carro Manuel8

Affiliation:

1. ICS-FORTH, Crete, Greece

2. Politecnico Di Milano, Italy

3. Eindhoven University of Technology, Germany

4. Paris Descartes University, France

5. Vienna University of Technology, Austria

6. MTA-SZTAKI, Hungary

7. Tilburg University, The Netherlands

8. Universidad Politécnica De Madrid and IMDEA Software Institute, Spain

Abstract

Quality of service (QoS) can be a critical element for achieving the business goals of a service provider, for the acceptance of a service by the user, or for guaranteeing service characteristics in a composition of services, where a service is defined as either a software or a software-support (i.e., infrastructural) service which is available on any type of network or electronic channel. The goal of this article is to compare the approaches to QoS description in the literature, where several models and metamodels are included. consider a large spectrum of models and metamodels to describe service quality, ranging from ontological approaches to define quality measures, metrics, and dimensions, to metamodels enabling the specification of quality-based service requirements and capabilities as well as of SLAs (Service-Level Agreements) and SLA templates for service provisioning. Our survey is performed by inspecting the characteristics of the available approaches to reveal which are the consolidated ones and which are the ones specific to given aspects and to analyze where the need for further research and investigation lies. The approaches here illustrated have been selected based on a systematic review of conference proceedings and journals spanning various research areas in computer science and engineering, including: distributed, information, and telecommunication systems, networks and security, and service-oriented and grid computing.

Funder

Seventh Framework Programme

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

General Computer Science,Theoretical Computer Science

Reference75 articles.

1. Allen P. 2006. Service Orientation Winning Strategies and Best Practices. Cambridge University Press Cambridge UK. Allen P. 2006. Service Orientation Winning Strategies and Best Practices. Cambridge University Press Cambridge UK.

2. Andrieux A. Dan A. Keahy K. Ludwig H. and Rofrano J. 2004. Negotiability constraints in WS-Agreement. Tech. rep. GRAAP-WG. Version 0.1. http://www.mcs.anl.gov/∼keahey/Meetings/GRAAP/WSAgreement%20Negotiability%20Constraints.pdf. Andrieux A. Dan A. Keahy K. Ludwig H. and Rofrano J. 2004. Negotiability constraints in WS-Agreement. Tech. rep. GRAAP-WG. Version 0.1. http://www.mcs.anl.gov/∼keahey/Meetings/GRAAP/WSAgreement%20Negotiability%20Constraints.pdf.

3. Methodologies for data quality assessment and improvement

4. An approach for the high-level specification of qos-aware grid workows considering location affinity. Sci;Brandic I.;Programm. J.,2006

Cited by 75 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. UML Profile for Decision-Making Systems Development with the Logic Scoring of Preference Method;2023 IEEE 12th International Conference on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems: Technology and Applications (IDAACS);2023-09-07

2. Developing Conceptualizations of Operational Technology and Service Quality for Critical Infrastructures – »Devcon«;2023 18th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI);2023-06-20

3. Multi-objective empirical computational complexity of single-tenant service instances deployed at the Edge;Journal of Systems and Software;2023-06

4. QCNN—A Conceptual Framework for Duplicate Removal in Big Data Using Quality Assured Crowd Sourcing Coupled with Neural Networks;Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems;2023

5. Screen Content Quality Assessment: Overview, Benchmark, and Beyond;ACM Computing Surveys;2022-12-31

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3