ExaPlan

Author:

Iliadis Ilias1,Jelitto Jens1,Kim Yusik2,Sarafijanovic Slavisa1,Venkatesan Vinodh1

Affiliation:

1. IBM Research - Zurich, Rüschlikon, Switzerland

2. IBM Netherlands, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Abstract

Multi-tiered storage, where each tier consists of one type of storage device (e.g., SSD, HDD, or disk arrays), is a commonly used approach to achieve both high performance and cost efficiency in large-scale systems that need to store data with vastly different access characteristics. By aligning the access characteristics of the data, either fixed-sized extents or variable-sized files, to the characteristics of the storage devices, a higher performance can be achieved for any given cost. This article presents ExaPlan, a method to determine both the data-to-tier assignment and the number of devices in each tier that minimize the system’s mean response time for a given budget and workload. In contrast to other methods that constrain or minimize the system load, ExaPlan directly minimizes the system’s mean response time estimated by a queueing model. Minimizing the mean response time is typically intractable as the resulting optimization problem is both nonconvex and combinatorial in nature. ExaPlan circumvents this intractability by introducing a parameterized data placement approach that makes it a highly scalable method that can be easily applied to exascale systems. Through experiments that use parameters from real-world storage systems, such as CERN and LOFAR, it is demonstrated that ExaPlan provides solutions that yield lower mean response times than previous works. It supports standalone SSDs and HDDs as well as disk arrays as storage tiers, and although it uses a static workload representation, we provide empirical evidence that underlying dynamic workloads have invariant properties that can be deemed static for the purpose of provisioning a storage system. ExaPlan is also effective as a load-balancing tool used for placing data across devices within a tier, resulting in an up to 3.6-fold reduction of response time compared with a traditional load-balancing algorithm, such as the Longest Processing Time heuristic.

Funder

Dutch government

province of Drenthe, The Netherlands

Dutch ministry of EL8I

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Hardware and Architecture

Reference24 articles.

1. Minerva

2. Hippodrome: Running circles around storage administration. In Proc. 1st USENIX Conf. on File and Storage Technologies (FAST’02);Anderson E.;Article,2002

3. Quickly finding near-optimal storage designs

4. Merging and splitting autocorrelated arrival processes and impact on queueing performance

5. Predicting when not to predict

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. An optimized learning-based directory placement policy with two-rounds selection in distributed file systems;Future Generation Computer Systems;2024-05

2. HyF2FS: A Filesystem to Fully Exploit the Parallelism of Hybrid Storage;2023 IEEE 41st International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD);2023-11-06

3. Machine Learning-based Adaptive Migration Algorithm for Hybrid Storage Systems;2022 IEEE International Conference on Networking, Architecture and Storage (NAS);2022-10

4. LDPP: A Learned Directory Placement Policy in Distributed File Systems;Proceedings of the 51st International Conference on Parallel Processing;2022-08-29

5. Bibliography;Storage Systems;2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3