Affiliation:
1. U.S. Air Force Academy
2. Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Abstract
We report the results of a year-long experiment in the use of robots to teach computer science. Our data set compares results from over 800 students on identical tests from both robotics and nonrobotics-based laboratory sessions. We also examine the effectiveness of robots in encouraging students to select computer science or computer engineering as a field of study. Our results are negative: test scores were lower in the robotics sections than in the nonrobotics ones, nor did the use of robots have any measurable effect on students' choice of discipline. We believe the most significant factor that accounts for this is the lack of a simulator for our robotics programming system. Students in robotics sections must run and debug their programs on robots during assigned lab times, and are therefore deprived of both reflective time and the rapid compile-run-debug cycle outside of class that is an important part of the learning process. We discuss this and other issues, and suggest directions for future work.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Reference16 articles.
1. BAUM D. 2002. The NQC Web site. Available at http://www.enteract.com/~dbaum/nqc. BAUM D. 2002. The NQC Web site. Available at http://www.enteract.com/~dbaum/nqc.
2. Using autonomous robotics to teach science and engineering
3. CONGDON C. FAGIN B. GOLDWEBER M. HWANG D. AND KlASSNER F. 2001. Experiences with robots in the classroom panel presented at the 32 nd SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. CONGDON C. FAGIN B. GOLDWEBER M. HWANG D. AND KlASSNER F. 2001. Experiences with robots in the classroom panel presented at the 32 nd SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education.
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献