Are Stakeholders the Only Source of Information for Requirements Engineers? Toward a Taxonomy of Elicitation Information Sources

Author:

Burnay Corentin1

Affiliation:

1. Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique-FNRS, Brussels Department of Business Administration, University of Namur PReCISE Research Center, Namur, Belgium

Abstract

Requirements elicitation consists in collecting and documenting information about the requirements from a system-to-be and about the environment of that system. Elicitation forms a critical step in the design of any information system, subject to many challenges like information incompleteness, variability, or ambiguity. To deal with these challenges, requirements engineers heavily rely on stakeholders, who turn out to be one of the most significant provider of information during elicitation. Sometimes, this comes at the cost of less attention being paid by engineers to other sources of information accessible in a business. In this article, we try to deal with this issue by studying the different sources of information that can be used by engineers when designing a system. We propose TELIS (a Taxonomy of Elicitation Sources), which can be used during elicitation to review more systematically the sources of information about a system-to-be. TELIS was produced through a series of empirical studies and was partially validated through a real-world case study. Our objective in this article is to increase the awareness of engineers about the other information providers within a business. Ultimately, we believe our taxonomy may help in better dealing with classical elicitation challenges and increase the chances of successful information systems design.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

General Computer Science,Management Information Systems

Reference86 articles.

1. Method for stakeholder identification in interorganizational environments

2. Users' involvement in requirements engineering and system success

3. Bruce L. Berg. 2004. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (4th ed.). Boston Pearson. Bruce L. Berg. 2004. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (4th ed.). Boston Pearson.

4. Apprenticing with the customer

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Method for Eliciting Requirements in the Area of Digital Sovereignty (MERDigS);Proceedings of Eighth International Congress on Information and Communication Technology;2023

2. Crowdsourced Requirements Engineering Challenges and Solutions: A Software Industry Perspective;Computer Systems Science and Engineering;2021

3. What lies behind requirements? A quality assessment of statement grounds in requirements elicitation;Software Quality Journal;2020-09-05

4. Security and Privacy Requirements for Cloud Computing in Healthcare;ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems;2020-07-08

5. Establishing a Reference Model for Requirements Elicitation Behavior;INCOSE International Symposium;2020-07

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3