Affiliation:
1. LIACS, Leiden University, The Netherlands
2. Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Science, China
3. Sorbonne Université, CNRS, LIP6, France
Abstract
Choosing a set of benchmark problems is often a key component of any empirical evaluation of iterative optimization heuristics. In continuous, single-objective optimization, several sets of problems have become widespread, including the well-established BBOB suite. While this suite is designed to enable rigorous benchmarking, it is also commonly used for testing methods such as algorithm selection, which the suite was never designed around.
We present the MA-BBOB function generator, which uses the BBOB suite as component functions in an affine combination. In this work, we describe the full procedure to create these affine combinations and highlight the trade-offs of several design decisions, specifically the choice to place the optimum uniformly at random in the domain. We then illustrate how this generator can be used to gain more low-level insight into the function landscapes through the use of exploratory landscape analysis.
Finally, we show a potential use-case of MA-BBOB in generating a wide set of training and testing data for algorithm selectors. Using this setup, we show that the basic scheme of using a set of landscape features to predict the best algorithm does not lead to optimal results, and that an algorithm selector trained purely on the BBOB functions generalizes poorly to the affine combinations.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Reference41 articles.
1. Anne Auger and Nikolaus Hansen. 2020. A SIGEVO Impact Award for a Paper Arising from the COCO Platform: A Summary and Beyond. https://evolution.sigevo.org/issues/HTML/sigevolution-13-4/home.html. Issue 3.
2. Algorithm selection based on exploratory landscape analysis and cost-sensitive learning
3. Gjorgjina Cenikj, Ryan Dieter Lang, Andries Petrus Engelbrecht, Carola Doerr, Peter Korošec, and Tome Eftimov. 2022. SELECTOR: selecting a representative benchmark suite for reproducible statistical comparison. In Proc. of Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO). 620–629.
4. Tuning as a means of assessing the benefits of new ideas in interplay with existing algorithmic modules
5. Jacob de Nobel, Furong Ye, Diederick Vermetten, Hao Wang, Carola Doerr, and Thomas Bäck. 2021b. IOHexperimenter: Benchmarking Platform for Iterative Optimization Heuristics. CoRR abs/2111.04077 (2021). arXiv:2111.04077 https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.04077
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献