A Tale of Two Cultures: Comparing Interpersonal Information Disclosure Norms on Twitter

Author:

Mondal Mainack1ORCID,Punuru Anju2ORCID,Cheng Tyng-Wen Scott3ORCID,Vargas Kenneth3ORCID,Gundry Chaz3ORCID,Driggs Nathan S.3ORCID,Schill Noah3ORCID,Carlson Nathaniel3ORCID,Bedwell Josh3ORCID,Lorenc Jaden Q.3ORCID,Ghosh Isha4ORCID,Li Yao5ORCID,Fulda Nancy3ORCID,Page Xinru3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. IIT Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal, India

2. IIT Kharagpur, Kharagpur, India

3. Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA

4. University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

5. University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA

Abstract

We present an exploration of cultural norms surrounding online disclosure of information about one's interpersonal relationships (such as information about family members, colleagues, friends, or lovers) on Twitter. The literature identifies the cultural dimension of individualism versus collectivism as being a major determinant of offline communication differences in terms of emotion, topic, and content disclosed. We decided to study whether such differences also occur online in context of Twitter when comparing tweets posted in an individualistic (U.S.) versus a collectivist (India) society. We collected more than 2 million tweets posted in the U.S. and India over a 3 month period which contain interpersonal relationship keywords. A card-sort study was used to develop this culturally-sensitive saturated taxonomy of keywords that represent interpersonal relationships (e.g., ma, mom, mother). Then we developed a high-accuracy interpersonal disclosure detector based on dependency-parsing (F1-score: 86%) to identify when the words refer to a personal relationship of the poster (e.g., "my mom" as opposed to "a mom"). This allowed us to identify the 400K+ tweets in our data set which actually disclose information about the poster's interpersonal relationships. We used a mixed methods approach to analyze these tweets (e.g., comparing the amount of joy expressed about one's family) and found differences in emotion, topic, and content disclosed between tweets from the U.S. versus India. Our analysis also reveals how a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods are needed to uncover these differences; Using just one or the other can be misleading. This study extends the prior literature on Multi-Party Privacy and provides guidance for researchers and designers of culturally-sensitive systems.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications,Human-Computer Interaction,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Reference91 articles.

1. Photo Sharing in the Arab Gulf

2. Imagined Communities: Awareness, Information Sharing, and Privacy on the Facebook

3. Alessandro Acquisti , Leslie John , and George Loewenstein . 2009 . What is privacy worth . Proceedings of the Workshop on Information Systems and Economics. Alessandro Acquisti, Leslie John, and George Loewenstein. 2009. What is privacy worth. Proceedings of the Workshop on Information Systems and Economics.

4. Over-exposed?

5. Irwin Altman . 1975. The Environment and Social Behavior: Privacy , Personal Space, Territory, and Crowding. ( 1975 ). http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED131515 Irwin Altman. 1975. The Environment and Social Behavior: Privacy, Personal Space, Territory, and Crowding. (1975). http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED131515

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3