When Workers Want to Say No: A View into Critical Consciousness and Workplace Democracy in Data Work

Author:

DiSalvo Carl1ORCID,Rothschild Annabel1ORCID,Schenck Lara L.1ORCID,Shapiro Ben Rydal2ORCID,DiSalvo Betsy1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Interactive Computing, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA

2. Department of Learning Sciences, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA

Abstract

In this paper, we describe and reflect upon the development of critical consciousness and workplace democracy within an experimental workplace called DataWorks. Through DataWorks, we hire adults from communities historically minoritized in computing education and data careers, and train them in entry-level data skills developed through work on client projects. In this process, workers gain a range of skills. Some of these skills are technical, such as programming for data analysis; some are managerial, such as scoping and bidding projects; others are social, perhaps even political, such as the ability to say "No" to projects. In what follows, we describe a workshop series developed to build the workers' critical literacy and consciousness about their data work, specifically regarding the use of data in machine learning systems. After that, we describe a data project the workers questioned and resisted because they determined the work to be harmful. In that process, they demonstrated and enacted a critical consciousness towards data and machine learning. Reflecting on this enactment of data-focused critical consciousness, we identify themes that characterize a democratic workplace, describe the work of designing for organizational action and institutional relations, and discuss how worker and researcher positionality affects this work. In doing so, we argue for enabling workers to resist and refuse harmful data work and challenge the standard power structures of academic research and data work.

Funder

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Reference104 articles.

1. Accomplices not allies: Abolishing the ally industrial complex;Action Indigenous;Indigenous Action Media,2014

2. Sara Ahmed. 2007. A phenomenology of whiteness. Feminist theory 8, 2 (2007), 149--168.

3. Sara Ahmed. 2012. On Being Included: Racism and Diversity in Institutional Life. Duke University Press.

4. Sara Ahmed. 2016. CONCLUSION 2. A Killjoy Manifesto. In Living a Feminist Life. Duke University Press, 251--268.

5. Sara Ahmed. 2021. Complaint! Duke University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3