Explainable AI for Medical Data: Current Methods, Limitations, and Future Directions

Author:

Hossain Md Imran1,Zamzmi Ghada1,Mouton Peter R.2,Salekin Md Sirajus1,Sun Yu1,Goldgof Dmitry1

Affiliation:

1. University of South Florida, USA

2. SRC Biosciences, USA

Abstract

With the power of parallel processing, large datasets,and fast computational resources, deep neural networks (DNNs) have outperformed highly trained and experienced human experts in medical applications. However, the large global community of healthcare professionals, many of whom routinely face potentially life-or-death outcomes with complex medicolegal consequences, have yet to embrace this powerful technology. The major problem is that most current AI solutions function as a metaphorical black-box positioned between input data and output decisions without a rigorous explanation for their internal processes. With the goal of enhancing trust and improving acceptance of AI-based technology in clinical medicine, there is a large and growing effort to address this challenge using eXplainable AI (XAI), a set of techniques, strategies, and algorithms with an explicit focus on explaining the “hows and whys” of DNNs. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of the state-of-the-art XAI techniques concerning healthcare applications and discuss current challenges and future directions. We emphasize the strengths and limitations of each category, including image, tabular, and textual explanations, and explore a range of evaluation metrics for assessing the effectiveness of XAI solutions. Finally, we highlight promising opportunities for XAI research to enhance the acceptance of DNNs by the healthcare community.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

General Computer Science,Theoretical Computer Science

Reference251 articles.

1. QUINT: Interpretable Question Answering over Knowledge Bases

2. Julius Adebayo , Justin Gilmer , Michael Muelly , Ian Goodfellow , Moritz Hardt , and Been Kim . 2018. Sanity checks for saliency maps. Advances in neural information processing systems 31 ( 2018 ). Julius Adebayo, Justin Gilmer, Michael Muelly, Ian Goodfellow, Moritz Hardt, and Been Kim. 2018. Sanity checks for saliency maps. Advances in neural information processing systems 31 (2018).

3. Rishabh Agarwal , Levi Melnick , Nicholas Frosst , Xuezhou Zhang , Ben Lengerich , Rich Caruana , and Geoffrey  E Hinton . 2021. Neural additive models: Interpretable machine learning with neural nets. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34 ( 2021 ). Rishabh Agarwal, Levi Melnick, Nicholas Frosst, Xuezhou Zhang, Ben Lengerich, Rich Caruana, and Geoffrey E Hinton. 2021. Neural additive models: Interpretable machine learning with neural nets. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34 (2021).

4. Ameen Ali Tal Shaharabany and Lior Wolf. 2021. Explainability Guided Multi-Site COVID-19 CT Classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.13677(2021). Ameen Ali Tal Shaharabany and Lior Wolf. 2021. Explainability Guided Multi-Site COVID-19 CT Classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.13677(2021).

5. David Alvarez Melis and Tommi Jaakkola . 2018. Towards robust interpretability with self-explaining neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems 31 ( 2018 ). David Alvarez Melis and Tommi Jaakkola. 2018. Towards robust interpretability with self-explaining neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems 31 (2018).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3