Gender and computer ethics

Author:

Adam Alison1

Affiliation:

1. University of Salford, UK

Abstract

This paper reviews the relatively small body of work in computer ethics which looks at the question of whether gender makes any difference to ethical decisions. There are two strands of writing on gender and computer ethics. The first focuses on problems of women's access to computer technology; the second concentrates on whether there are differences between men and women's ethical decision making in relation to information and computing technologies (ICTs). I criticize the latter area, arguing that such studies survey student audiences, that they emphasize the result of an ethical decision over the process of arriving at the decision, that they are problematic in relation to research methodology and that they are undertheorized. Given that traditional ethical theories largely ignore gender, I offer a gender based ethics in terms of feminist ethics as the best place to look for theoretical substance. The paper concludes by considering how feminist ethics can be combined with empirical studies that emphasize observation and interviewing in order to move gender and computer ethics onward from statistical studies of men's and women's ethical decisions toward more substantially theorized studies of areas in computer ethics which have gender implications, such as privacy and power.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Reference38 articles.

1. Adam A. (1998) Artificial knowing: gender and the thinking machine. Routledge London and New York. Adam A. (1998) Artificial knowing: gender and the thinking machine. Routledge London and New York.

2. Bowden P. (1997) Caring: gender-sensitive ethics. Routledge London and New York. Bowden P. (1997) Caring: gender-sensitive ethics. Routledge London and New York.

3. Brosnan M. J. (1998) Technophobia: the psychological impact of information technology. Routledge London and New York. Brosnan M. J. (1998) Technophobia: the psychological impact of information technology. Routledge London and New York.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Twitter Users’ Privacy Concerns: What do Their Accounts’ First Names Tell Us?;Journal of Data and Information Science;2018-02-01

2. A Gendered Approach to Science Ethics for US and UK Physicists;Science and Engineering Ethics;2016-01-21

3. Student Perceptions of Computer Use Ethics: A Decade in Comparison;Journal of Information Privacy and Security;2014-06-12

4. Gender issues in information and communication technologies (ICTs);Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society;2012-05-11

5. Self sanction and regulative sanction against copyright infringement: A comparison between U.S. and China college students;Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology;2009-08

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3