Learning Theories Use and Relationships in Computing Education Research

Author:

Szabo Claudia1ORCID,Sheard Judy2

Affiliation:

1. University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

2. Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

Abstract

The use of established and discipline-specific theories within research and practice is an indication of the maturity of a discipline. With computing education research as a relatively young discipline, there has been recent interest in investigating theories that may prove foundational to work in this area, with discipline-specific theories and many theories from other disciplines emerging as relevant. A challenge for the researcher is to identify and select the theories that provide the best foundation for their work. Learning is a complex and multi-faceted process and, as such, a plethora of theories are potentially applicable to a research problem. Knowing the possible candidate theories and understanding their relationships and potential applicability, both individually or as a community of theories, is important to provide a comprehensive grounding for researchers and practitioners alike. In this work, we investigate the fundamental connections between learning theories foundational to research and practice in computing education. We build a comprehensive list of 84 learning theories and their source and influential papers, which are the papers that introduce or propagate specific theories within the research community. Using Scopus, ACM Digital Library, and Google Scholar, we identify the papers that cite these learning theories. We subsequently consider all possible pairs of these theories and build the set of papers that cite each pair. On this weighted graph of learning theory connections, we perform a community analysis to identify groups of closely linked learning theories. We find that most of the computing education learning theories are closely linked with a number of broader learning theories, forming a separate cluster of 17 learning theories. We build a taxonomy of theory relationships to identify the depth of connections between learning theories. Of the 294 analysed links, we find deep connections in 32 links. This indicates that while the computing education research community is aware of a large number of learning theories, there is still a need to better understand how learning theories are connected and how they can be used together to benefit computing education research and practice.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Education,General Computer Science

Reference197 articles.

1. George A. Miller Eugene Galanter and Karl H. Pribram. 1960. Plans and the Structure of Behavior. Henry Holt and Co.

2. Gordon Pask. 1976. Conversation theory: Applications in Education and Epistemology. Elsevier Science.

3. Gephi. [n.d.]. Retrieved from https://gephi.org/.

4. Edith Ackermann. 1996. Constructionism in Practice: Designing, Thinking, and Learning in a Digital World. Routledge.

5. Geek genes, prior knowledge, stumbling points and learning edge momentum

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Domain-Specific Theories of Teaching Computing: Do they Inform Practice?;Proceedings of the 23rd Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research;2023-11-13

2. What is Computing Education Research (CER)?;Past, Present and Future of Computing Education Research;2023

3. A Case Study: The Uppsala Computing Education Research Group (UpCERG);Past, Present and Future of Computing Education Research;2023

4. Reflections on Theory;ACM Transactions on Computing Education;2022-12-29

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3