Reproducing popularity bias in recommendation: the effect of evaluation strategies

Author:

Daniil Savvina1,Cuper Mirjam2,Liem Cynthia C. S.3,van Ossenbruggen Jacco4,Hollink Laura1

Affiliation:

1. Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

2. National Library of the Netherlands, The Hague, The Netherlands

3. Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands

4. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Abstract

The extent to which popularity bias is propagated by media recommender systems is a current topic within the community, as is the uneven propagation among users with varying interests for niche items. Recent work focused on exactly this topic, with movies being the domain of interest. Later on, two different research teams reproduced the methodology in the domains of music and books respectively. The results across the different domains diverge. In this paper, we reproduce the three studies and identify four aspects that are relevant in investigating the differences in results: data, algorithms, division of users in groups and evaluation strategy. We run a set of experiments in which we measure general popularity bias propagation and unfair treatment of certain users with various combinations of these aspects. We conclude that all aspects account to some degree for the divergence in results, and should be carefully considered in future studies. Further, we find that the divergence in findings can be in large part attributed to the choice of evaluation strategy.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Reference39 articles.

1. Popularity Bias in Ranking and Recommendation

2. Himan Abdollahpouri . 2020. Popularity bias in recommendation: a multi-stakeholder perspective. Ph. D. Dissertation . University of Colorado at Boulder. Himan Abdollahpouri. 2020. Popularity bias in recommendation: a multi-stakeholder perspective. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Colorado at Boulder.

3. Himan Abdollahpouri , Masoud Mansoury , Robin Burke , and Bamshad Mobasher . 2019. The Unfairness of Popularity Bias in Recommendation . In RecSys Workshop on Recommendation in Multistakeholder Environments (RMSE 2019 ). https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2440/paper4.pdf RecSys Workshop on Recommendation in Multistakeholder Environments (RMSE) ; Conference date: 20-09-2019. Himan Abdollahpouri, Masoud Mansoury, Robin Burke, and Bamshad Mobasher. 2019. The Unfairness of Popularity Bias in Recommendation. In RecSys Workshop on Recommendation in Multistakeholder Environments (RMSE 2019). https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2440/paper4.pdf RecSys Workshop on Recommendation in Multistakeholder Environments (RMSE) ; Conference date: 20-09-2019.

4. Chris Anderson. 2006. The long tail: Why the future of business is selling less of more. Hachette UK. Chris Anderson. 2006. The long tail: Why the future of business is selling less of more. Hachette UK.

5. Joeran Beel , Corinna Breitinger , Stefan Langer , Andreas Lommatzsch , and Bela Gipp . 2016. Towards reproducibility in recommender-systems research. User modeling and user-adapted interaction 26 ( 2016 ), 69–101. Joeran Beel, Corinna Breitinger, Stefan Langer, Andreas Lommatzsch, and Bela Gipp. 2016. Towards reproducibility in recommender-systems research. User modeling and user-adapted interaction 26 (2016), 69–101.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3