Development and Use of Domain-specific Learning Theories, Models, and Instruments in Computing Education

Author:

Malmi Lauri1ORCID,Sheard Judy2ORCID,Kinnunen Päivi3ORCID,Simon 4ORCID,Sinclair Jane5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Aalto University, Espoo, Finland

2. Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

3. University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

4. Unaffiliated, Wadalba, NSW, Australia

5. University of Warwick, Warwick, United Kingdom

Abstract

Use of theory within a field of research provides the foundation for designing effective research programs and establishing a deeper understanding of the results obtained. This, together with the emergence of domain-specific theory, is often taken as an indicator of the maturity of any research area. This article explores the development and subsequent usage of domain-specific theories and theoretical constructs (TCs) in computing education research (CER). All TCs found in 878 papers published in three major CER publication venues over the period 2005–2020 were identified and assessed to determine the nature and purpose of the constructs found. We focused more closely on areas related to learning, studying, and progression, where our analysis found 80 new TCs that had been developed, based on multiple epistemological perspectives. Several existing frameworks were used to categorize the areas of CER focus in which TCs were found, the methodology by which they were developed, and the nature and purpose of the TCs. A citation analysis was undertaken, with 1,727 citing papers accessed to determine to what extent and in what ways TCs had been used and developed to inform subsequent work, also considering whether these aspects vary according to different focus areas within computing education. We noted which TCs were used most often and least often, and we present several brief case studies that demonstrate progressive development of domain-specific theory. The exploration provides insights into trends in theory development and suggests areas in which further work might be called for. Our findings indicate a general interest in the development of TCs during the period studied, and we show examples of how different approaches to theory development have been used. We present a framework suggesting how strategies for developing new TCs in CER might be structured and discuss the nature of theory development in relation to the field of CER.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Education,General Computer Science

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Human-Centered Digital Sustainability: Handling Enumerated Lists in Digital Texts;IEEE Access;2024

2. Efficacy of micro credential learning spaces in developing students’ twenty-first century skills: Towards graduate work readiness;Education and Information Technologies;2023-12-01

3. Domain-Specific Theories of Teaching Computing: Do they Inform Practice?;Proceedings of the 23rd Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research;2023-11-13

4. Pre-testing erroneous text-based documents: Logging end-user activities;Frontiers in Education;2023-03-15

5. Computing Education Research as a Translational Transdiscipline;Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1;2023-03-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3