The Right to Transparency in Public Governance Freedom of Information and the Use of Artificial Intelligence by Public Agencies

Author:

Olsen Henrik Palmer1ORCID,Hildebrandt Thomas Troels2ORCID,Wiesener Cornelius1ORCID,Larsen Matthias Smed1ORCID,Ammitzbøll Flügge Asbjørn William2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Law

2. University of Copenhagen, Department of Computer Science

Abstract

What information should and can be transparent for Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms? This article examines the socio-technical and legal perspectives of transparency in relation to algorithmic decision-making in public administration. We show how transparency in AI can be understood in light of the various technologies and the challenges one may encounter. Despite some first steps in that direction, there exists so far no mature standard for documenting AI models. From a legal perspective, this article examined the applicable freedom of information (FOI) regimes across different jurisdictions, with a particular focus on Denmark and other Scandinavian countries. Despite notable differences, our findings show that the FOI regimes generally only grant access to existing documents, and that access can be denied on the basis of the wide proprietary interests and internal documents exemptions. This is why we ultimately conclude that the European data-protection framework and the proposed EU AI Act – with their far-reaching duties to document the functioning of AI systems – provide promising new avenues for research and insights into transparency in AI.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Public Administration,Software,Information Systems,Computer Science Applications,Computer Networks and Communications

Reference95 articles.

1. Transparency's Ideological Drift;Pozen David E.;Yale Law Journal,2018

2. In Europe , the term ‘access to information ’ is more frequently used. Yet, for the sake of consistency, we will use freedom of information or FOI throughout this article. In Europe, the term ‘access to information’ is more frequently used. Yet, for the sake of consistency, we will use freedom of information or FOI throughout this article.

3. First Danish FOI Act. 1970. https://www.jurabibliotek.dk/display/book/9788771984781/back-14.xml. First Danish FOI Act. 1970. https://www.jurabibliotek.dk/display/book/9788771984781/back-14.xml.

4. Sweden is an outlier since it had already recognised the principle of public access to official documents under the Freedom of the Press Act of 1766. Sweden is an outlier since it had already recognised the principle of public access to official documents under the Freedom of the Press Act of 1766.

5. Principled Artificial Intelligence: Mapping Consensus in Ethical and Rights-Based Approaches to Principles for AI

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3