Interactive Search vs. Automatic Search

Author:

Nguyen Phuong-Anh1,Ngo Chong-Wah1

Affiliation:

1. City University of Hong Kong, China

Abstract

This article conducts user evaluation to study the performance difference between interactive and automatic search. Particularly, the study aims to provide empirical insights of how the performance landscape of video search changes, with tens of thousands of concept detectors freely available to exploit for query formulation. We compare three types of search modes: free-to-play (i.e., search from scratch), non-free-to-play (i.e., search by inspecting results provided by automatic search), and automatic search including concept-free and concept-based retrieval paradigms. The study involves a total of 40 participants; each performs interactive search over 15 queries of various difficulty levels using two search modes on the IACC.3 dataset provided by TRECVid organizers. The study suggests that the performance of automatic search is still far behind interactive search. Furthermore, providing users with the result of automatic search for exploration does not show obvious advantage over asking users to search from scratch. The study also analyzes user behavior to reveal insights of how users compose queries, browse results, and discover new query terms for search, which can serve as guideline for future research of both interactive and automatic search.

Funder

Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications,Hardware and Architecture

Reference74 articles.

1. George Awad Asad A. Butt Jonathan G. Fiscus David Joy Andrew Delgado Martial Michel Alan F. Smeaton Yvette Graham Gareth J. F. Jones Wessel Kraaij Georges Quénot Maria Eskevich Roeland Ordelman and Benoit Huet (Eds.). 2017. 2017 TREC Video Retrieval Evaluation (TRECVID’17). National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Retrieved from https://www-nlpir.nist.gov/projects/tvpubs/tv.pubs.17.org.html. George Awad Asad A. Butt Jonathan G. Fiscus David Joy Andrew Delgado Martial Michel Alan F. Smeaton Yvette Graham Gareth J. F. Jones Wessel Kraaij Georges Quénot Maria Eskevich Roeland Ordelman and Benoit Huet (Eds.). 2017. 2017 TREC Video Retrieval Evaluation (TRECVID’17). National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Retrieved from https://www-nlpir.nist.gov/projects/tvpubs/tv.pubs.17.org.html.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3