Affiliation:
1. CISTER Research Centre and ISEP/IPP, Porto, Portugal
2. University of Porto, Faculty of Engineering and CISTER Research Centre, Porto, Portugal
3. ESI (TNO), Eindhoven and University of Amsterdam, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
Abstract
In mixed-criticality systems, tasks of different criticality share system resources, mainly to reduce cost. Cost is further reduced by using adaptive mode-based scheduling arrangements, such as Vestal’s model, to improve resource efficiency, while guaranteeing schedulability of critical functionality. To simplify safety certification, servers are often used to provide temporal isolation between tasks. In its simplest form, a server is a periodically recurring time window, in which some tasks are scheduled. A server’s computational requirements may greatly vary in different modes, although state-of-the-art techniques and schedulability tests do not allow different budgets to be used by a server in different modes. This results in a single conservative execution budget for all modes, increasing system cost.
The goal of this paper is to reduce the cost of mixed-criticality systems through three main contributions: (i) a scheduling arrangement for uniprocessor systems employing fixed-priority scheduling within periodic servers, whose budgets are dynamically adjusted at run-time in the event of a mode change, (ii) a new schedulability analysis for such systems, and (iii) heuristic algorithms for assigning budgets to servers in different modes and ordering the execution of the servers. Experiments with synthetic task sets demonstrate considerable improvements (up to 52.8%) in scheduling success ratio when using dynamic server budgets vs. static “one-size-fits-all-modes” budgets.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Subject
Hardware and Architecture,Software
Reference35 articles.
1. 2016. Certification Authorities Software Team (CAST) Position Paper (CAST-32A) Multicore Processors. 2016. Certification Authorities Software Team (CAST) Position Paper (CAST-32A) Multicore Processors.
2. AERONAUTICAL RADIO INC. 2010. Avionics application software standard interface part 1 required services (ARINC SPECIFICATION 653P1-3 ed.). AERONAUTICAL RADIO INC. AERONAUTICAL RADIO INC. 2010. Avionics application software standard interface part 1 required services (ARINC SPECIFICATION 653P1-3 ed.). AERONAUTICAL RADIO INC.
3. Uneven memory regulation for scheduling IMA applications on multi-core platforms