Trust and distrust in online fact-checking services-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Trust and distrust in online fact-checking services

Published:2017-08-23 Issue:9 Volume:60 Page:65-71
ISSN:0001-0782
Container-title:Communications of the ACM
language:en
Short-container-title:Commun. ACM

Author:

Brandtzaeg Petter Bae¹,Følstad Asbjørn¹

Affiliation:

1. SINTEF in Oslo, Norway

Abstract

Even when checked by fact checkers, facts are often still open to preexisting bias and doubt.

Funder

FP 7 project REVEAL

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

General Computer Science

Link

https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3122803

Reference16 articles.

1. Ezzy D. Qualitative Analysis. Routledge London U.K. 2013. Ezzy D. Qualitative Analysis. Routledge London U.K. 2013.

2. The psychological advantage of unfalsifiability: The appeal of untestable religious and political ideologies;Friesen J.P.;Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,2014

3. TWEETS AND TRUTH

Cited by 102 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Geo-spatial hypertext in virtual reality: mapping and navigating global news event spaces;New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia;2024-08-29

2. Using Artificial Intelligence Systems in News Verification: An Application on X;İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi;2024-07-25

3. Community notes increase trust in fact-checking on social media;PNAS Nexus;2024-05-31

4. Why Do Social Media Users Accept, Doubt or Resist Corrective Information? A Qualitative Analysis of Comments in Response to Corrective Information on Social Media;Journalism Studies;2024-04-15

5. Show Me the Facts: Newsroom-Affiliated and Independent Fact-Checkers’ Transparency Acts;Digital Journalism;2024-04-05