What’s (Not) Working in Programmer User Studies?

Author:

Davis Matthew C.1ORCID,Aghayi Emad2ORCID,Latoza Thomas D.2ORCID,Wang Xiaoyin3ORCID,Myers Brad A.1ORCID,Sunshine Joshua1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Carnegie Mellon University, USA

2. George Mason University, USA

3. University of Texas at San Antonio, USA

Abstract

A key goal of software engineering research is to improve the environments, tools, languages, and techniques programmers use to efficiently create quality software. Successfully designing these tools and demonstrating their effectiveness involves engaging with tool users—software engineers. Researchers often want to conduct user studies of software engineers to collect direct evidence. However, running user studies can be difficult, and researchers may lack solution strategies to overcome the barriers, so they may avoid user studies. To understand the challenges researchers face when conducting programmer user studies, we interviewed 26 researchers. Based on the analysis of interview data, we contribute (i) a taxonomy of 18 barriers researchers encounter; (ii) 23 solution strategies some researchers use to address 8 of the 18 barriers in their own studies; and (iii) 4 design ideas, which we adapted from the behavioral science community, that may lower 8 additional barriers. To validate the design ideas, we held an in-person all-day focus group with 16 researchers.

Funder

NSF

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Software

Reference113 articles.

1. The micro-task market for lemons: data quality on Amazon's Mechanical Turk

2. There is no random sampling in software engineering research

3. Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder

4. 2022. An author of “Arrestt: A framework to create reproducible experiments to evaluate software testing techniques.” Personal communication.

5. Worse Than Spam

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Evaluating Tools for Enhancing Reproducibility in Computational Scientific Experiments;Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Reproducibility and Replicability;2024-06-18

2. A Scoping Study of Evaluation Practices for Responsible AI Tools: Steps Towards Effectiveness Evaluations;Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems;2024-05-11

3. CodeGRITS: A Research Toolkit for Developer Behavior and Eye Tracking in IDE;Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings;2024-04-14

4. Using an LLM to Help With Code Understanding;Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering;2024-04-12

5. NaNofuzz: A Usable Tool for Automatic Test Generation;Proceedings of the 31st ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering;2023-11-30

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3