Affiliation:
1. Carnegie Mellon University
Abstract
A recent SIGACT News Logic column, guest-written by James Cheney
DOI =
10.1145/1107523.1107537
, discussed nominal logic [1], an
approach to abstract syntax with binding structure. In addition to
providing a worthy tutorial on nominal logic, that column leveled
five criticisms at higher-order abstract syntax, an alternative
approach for dealing with binding structure in abstract syntax. We
argue below that three of those criticisms are factually
inaccurate, and the other two are misguided.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Reference3 articles.
1. A New Approach to Abstract Syntax with Variable Binding
2. A framework for defining logics
3. {3} Frank Pfenning and Carsten Schürmann. Twelf User's Guide Version 1.4 2002. Available electronically at http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~twelf. {3} Frank Pfenning and Carsten Schürmann. Twelf User's Guide Version 1.4 2002. Available electronically at http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~twelf.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献