Minimal Specifications for Detecting Security Vulnerabilities

Author:

Berns Andrew1,Curbow James1,Hilliard Joshua1,Jorkeh Sheriff1,Sanders Miho1

Affiliation:

1. University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, IA, USA

Abstract

Computers are nearly ubiquitous in modern society with uses from maintaining friendships and monitoring homes to managing money and coordinating health care. As the roles of a computer continue to expand, so to does the threat posed by cyberattacks. An important challenge for today's software engineers is to build secure software and help neutralize these threats. Formal methods have long been suggested as an excellent way to build secure software but have not been widely adopted for this purpose. The "conventional wisdom" has suggested several reasons for this slow adoption, including a steep learning curve, difficulty in augmenting existing systems, and lack of tools with security-specific abstractions. Our hypothesis, however, is that applying a small and easy to learn subset of the techniques available today could significantly decrease software vulnerabilities and reduce the risk of cyberattacks. In this paper, we discuss the motivation for our hypothesis and discuss our ongoing experiment to test it.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Reference23 articles.

1. Magdy S. Abadir Kenneth L. Albin John Havlicek Narayanan Krishnamurthy and Andrew K. Martin. 2003. Formal Verification Successes at Motorola. Formal Methods in System Design 22 2 (01 Mar 2003) 117--123. https://doi.org/10.1023/A: 1022917321255 Magdy S. Abadir Kenneth L. Albin John Havlicek Narayanan Krishnamurthy and Andrew K. Martin. 2003. Formal Verification Successes at Motorola. Formal Methods in System Design 22 2 (01 Mar 2003) 117--123. https://doi.org/10.1023/A: 1022917321255

2. Paul E. Black Lee Badger Barbara Guttman and Elizabeth Fong. 2016. Dramatically Reducing Software Vulnerabilities. Paul E. Black Lee Badger Barbara Guttman and Elizabeth Fong. 2016. Dramatically Reducing Software Vulnerabilities.

3. US National Security Agency Center for Assured Software (CAS). 2017. Juliet Test Suite. https://samate.nist.gov/SRD/testsuite.php US National Security Agency Center for Assured Software (CAS). 2017. Juliet Test Suite. https://samate.nist.gov/SRD/testsuite.php

4. Temporal Mode-Checking for Runtime Monitoring of Privacy Policies

5. David R. Cok. 2011. OpenJML: JML for Java 7 by Extending OpenJDK. In NASA Formal Methods Mihaela Bobaru Klaus Havelund Gerard J. Holzmann and Rajeev Joshi (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg Berlin Heidelberg 472--479. David R. Cok. 2011. OpenJML: JML for Java 7 by Extending OpenJDK. In NASA Formal Methods Mihaela Bobaru Klaus Havelund Gerard J. Holzmann and Rajeev Joshi (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg Berlin Heidelberg 472--479.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3