Affiliation:
1. Office of Computer Services, RPI
2. Union College
Abstract
This paper reports on the experiences at Union University in using a minicomputer based time-sharing facility versus a loosely-coupled microcomputer based facility. These two facilities are the only computer resources used by two disjoint academic populations. Comparisons are drawn on the acquisition costs, staffing, and operating costs. The microcomputer system is an inexpensive, viable alternative.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Reference2 articles.
1. 1979--80 Microcomputer Report of the Minnesota Educational Computing Consortium MCCC Instructional Services Division Lauderdale MN 44113. 1979--80 Microcomputer Report of the Minnesota Educational Computing Consortium MCCC Instructional Services Division Lauderdale MN 44113.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献