A Meta-Study of Software-Change Intentions

Author:

Krüger Jacob1ORCID,Li Yi2ORCID,Lossev Kirill3ORCID,Zhu Chenguang4ORCID,Chechik Marsha3ORCID,Berger Thorsten5ORCID,Rubin Julia6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department for Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands

2. School of Computer Science and Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore

3. University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

4. The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States

5. Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany

6. The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

Abstract

Every software system undergoes changes, for example, to add new features, fix bugs, or refactor code. The importance of understanding software changes has been widely recognized, resulting in various techniques and studies, for instance, on change-impact analysis or classifying developers’ activities. Since changes are triggered by developers’ intentions—something they plan or want to change in the system, many researchers have studied intentions behind changes. While there appears to be a consensus among software-engineering researchers and practitioners that knowing the intentions behind software changes is important, it is not clear how developers can actually benefit from this knowledge. In fact, there is no consolidated, recent overview of the state-of-the-art on software-change intentions (SCIs) and their relevance for software engineering. We present a meta-study of 122 publications, which we used to derive a categorization of SCIs; and to discuss motivations, evidence, and techniques relating to SCIs. Unfortunately, we found that individual pieces of research are often disconnected from each other because a common understanding is missing. Similarly, some publications showcase the potential of knowing SCIs, but more substantial research to understand the practical benefits of knowing SCIs is needed. Our contributions can help researchers and practitioners improve their understanding of SCIs and how SCIs can aid software engineering tasks.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Reference171 articles.

1. Alain Abran and Hong Nguyenkim. 1991. Analysis of Maintenance Work Categories Through Measurement. In ICSM. IEEE.

2. Alain Abran and Hong Nguyenkim. 1993. Measurement of the Maintenance Process from a Demand-Based Perspective. J. Softw. Maint. Res. Pract. 5 (1993).

3. Jonas Åkesson Sebastian Nilsson Jacob Krüger and Thorsten Berger. 2019. Migrating the Android Apo-Games into an Annotation-Based Software Product Line. In SPLC. ACM.

4. Mohammed Alhamed and Tim Storer. 2022. Evaluation of Context-Aware Language Models and Experts for Effort Estimation of Software Maintenance Issues. In ICSME. IEEE.

5. Eman A. AlOmar Jiaqian Liu Kenneth Addo Mohamed W. Mkaouer Christian Newman Ali Ouni and Zhe Yu. 2022. On the Documentation of Refactoring Types. Autom. Softw. Eng. 29(2022).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3