Affiliation:
1. Beihang University, Beijing, China
2. Capital Normal University, Beijing, China
Abstract
Defect prediction is crucial for software quality assurance and has been extensively researched over recent decades. However, prior studies rarely focus on data complexity in defect prediction tasks, and even less on understanding the difficulties of these tasks from the perspective of data complexity. In this article, we conduct an empirical study to estimate the hardness of over 33,000 instances, employing a set of measures to characterize the inherent difficulty of instances and the characteristics of defect datasets. Our findings indicate that: (1) instance hardness in both classes displays a right-skewed distribution, with the defective class exhibiting a more scattered distribution; (2) class overlap is the primary factor influencing instance hardness and can be characterized through feature, structural, and instance-level overlap; (3) no universal preprocessing technique is applicable to all datasets, and it may not consistently reduce data complexity, fortunately, dataset complexity measures can help identify suitable techniques for specific datasets; (4) integrating data complexity information into the learning process can enhance an algorithm’s learning capacity. In summary, this empirical study highlights the crucial role of data complexity in defect prediction tasks, and provides a novel perspective for advancing research in defect prediction techniques.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Reference103 articles.
1. Is "better data" better than "better data miners"?
2. Núria Macià Antolínez. 2011. Data Complexity in Supervised Learning: A Far-Reaching Implication. Ph. D. Dissertation. Universitat Ramon Llull.
3. Measuring Instance Hardness Using Data Complexity Measures
4. Gustavo EAPA Batista, Ana L. C. Bazzan, and Maria Carolina Monard. 2003. Balancing training data for automated annotation of keywords: A case study. In Proceedings of the WOB. 10–18.
5. A study of the behavior of several methods for balancing machine learning training data
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献