Affiliation:
1. University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
Abstract
A recent experimental evaluation assessed 19 time series classification (TSC) algorithms and found that one was significantly more accurate than all others: the Flat Collective of Transformation-based Ensembles (Flat-COTE). Flat-COTE is an ensemble that combines 35 classifiers over four data representations. However, while comprehensive, the evaluation did not consider deep learning approaches. Convolutional neural networks (CNN) have seen a surge in popularity and are now state of the art in many fields and raises the question of whether CNNs could be equally transformative for TSC.
We implement a benchmark CNN for TSC using a common structure and use results from a TSC-specific CNN from the literature. We compare both to Flat-COTE and find that the collective is significantly more accurate than both CNNs. These results are impressive, but Flat-COTE is not without deficiencies. We significantly improve the collective by proposing a new hierarchical structure with probabilistic voting, defining and including two novel ensemble classifiers built in existing feature spaces, and adding further modules to represent two additional transformation domains. The resulting classifier, the Hierarchical Vote Collective of Transformation-based Ensembles (HIVE-COTE), encapsulates classifiers built on five data representations. We demonstrate that HIVE-COTE is significantly more accurate than Flat-COTE (and all other TSC algorithms that we are aware of) over 100 resamples of 85 TSC problems and is the new state of the art for TSC. Further analysis is included through the introduction and evaluation of 3 new case studies and extensive experimentation on 1,000 simulated datasets of 5 different types.
Funder
UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Research and Specialist Computing Support service at the University of East Anglia
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Reference44 articles.
1. A. Bagnall A. Bostrom J. Large and J. Lines. 2016. Simulated Data Experiments for Time Series Classification Part 1: Accuracy Comparison with Default Settings. Technical Report. School of Computing Sciences University of East Anglia. A. Bagnall A. Bostrom J. Large and J. Lines. 2016. Simulated Data Experiments for Time Series Classification Part 1: Accuracy Comparison with Default Settings. Technical Report. School of Computing Sciences University of East Anglia.
2. A Run Length Transformation for Discriminating Between Auto Regressive Time Series
3. The great time series classification bake off: a review and experimental evaluation of recent algorithmic advances
4. Time-Series Classification with COTE: The Collective of Transformation-Based Ensembles
Cited by
217 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献