Can Online Juries Make Consistent, Repeatable Decisions?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Can Online Juries Make Consistent, Repeatable Decisions?

Published:2021-05-06 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:
Container-title:Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Hu Xinlan Emily¹,Whiting Mark E²,Bernstein Michael S.¹

Affiliation:

1. Computer Science Stanford University, United States

2. Computer Science Stanford, United States

Publisher

ACM

Link

https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3411764.3445433

Reference68 articles.

1. Five Design Principles for Crowdsourced Policymaking: Assessing the Case of Crowdsourced Off-Road Traffic Law in Finland;Aitamurto Tanja;Journal of Social Media for Organizations,2015

2. Street-Level Algorithms

3. Jennifer Nancy Lee Allen Antonio Alonso Arechar Gordon Pennycook and David Rand. 2020. Scaling up Fact-Checking Using the Wisdom of Crowds. (2020). Unpublished preprint. Jennifer Nancy Lee Allen Antonio Alonso Arechar Gordon Pennycook and David Rand. 2020. Scaling up Fact-Checking Using the Wisdom of Crowds. (2020). Unpublished preprint.

4. A Brief History of the Criminal Jury in the United States

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Measuring User-Moderator Alignment on r/ChangeMyView;Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction;2023-09-28

2. A Comparative Evaluation of Interventions Against Misinformation: Augmenting the WHO Checklist;CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems;2022-04-29

3. The Influences of Task Design on Crowdsourced Judgement: A Case Study of Recidivism Risk Evaluation;Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022;2022-04-25