How to Put Through Your Agenda in Collective Binary Decisions
-
Published:2016-01-05
Issue:1
Volume:4
Page:1-28
-
ISSN:2167-8375
-
Container-title:ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:ACM Trans. Econ. Comput.
Author:
Alon Noga1,
Bredereck Robert2,
Chen Jiehua2,
Kratsch Stefan2,
Niedermeier Rolf2,
Woeginger Gerhard J.3
Affiliation:
1. Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
2. TU Berlin
3. TU Eindhoven
Abstract
We consider the following decision-making scenario: a society of voters has to find an agreement on a set of proposals, and every single proposal is to be accepted or rejected. Each voter supports a certain subset of the proposals—the
favorite ballot
of this voter—and opposes the remaining ones. He accepts a ballot if he supports more than half of the proposals in this ballot. The task is to decide whether there exists a ballot approving a specified number of selected proposals (agenda) such that all voters (or a strict majority of them) accept this ballot.
We show that, on the negative side, both problems are NP-complete, and on the positive side, they are fixed-parameter tractable with respect to the total number of proposals or with respect to the total number of voters. We look into further natural parameters and study their influence on the computational complexity of both problems, thereby providing both tractability and intractability results. Furthermore, we provide tight combinatorial bounds on the worst-case size of an accepted ballot in terms of the number of voters.
Funder
USA-Israeli BSF
Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes
DIAMANT
DFG
ERC
ISF
Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
I-Core
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Subject
Computational Mathematics,Marketing,Economics and Econometrics,Statistics and Probability,Computer Science (miscellaneous)
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献