Enacting Data Feminism in Advocacy Data Work-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Enacting Data Feminism in Advocacy Data Work

Published:2023-04-14 Issue:CSCW1 Volume:7 Page:1-28
ISSN:2573-0142
Container-title:Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
language:en
Short-container-title:Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact.

Author:

Darian Shiva¹^ORCID,Chauhan Aarjav¹^ORCID,Marton Ricky²^ORCID,Ruppert Janet²^ORCID,Anderson Kathleen²^ORCID,Clune Ryan²^ORCID,Cupchak Madeline²^ORCID,Gannett Max²^ORCID,Holton Joel¹^ORCID,Kamas Elizabeth²^ORCID,Kibozi-Yocka Jason²^ORCID,Mauro-Gallegos Devin²^ORCID,Naylor Simon²^ORCID,O'Malley Meghan²^ORCID,Patel Mehul²^ORCID,Sandberg Jack²^ORCID,Siegler Troy²^ORCID,Tate Ryan²^ORCID,Temtim Abigil²^ORCID,Whaley Samantha²^ORCID,Voida Amy²^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA

2. University of Colorado, Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA

Abstract

In this paper, we present the results of a study that examines the role of data in nonprofit advocacy work. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 25 individuals who play critical roles in the data work of 18 different advocacy organizations. Our analysis reveals five key stakeholders in advocacy data work-beneficiaries, policymakers, funding and partner organizations, gatekeepers, and local publics. It also contributes a framework of four functions of data work in nonprofit organizations-data as amplifier, activator, legitimizer, and incubator. We characterize the challenges in data work that exist, particularly in widespread attempts to reappropriate data work across functions. These challenges in reappropriation are often rooted in participants' effects to enact data feminist principles from the margins of the data economy. Finally, we discuss how nonprofit institutions operate outside of the dominant data work goals known as the three Ss (surveillance, selling, and science) and propose a fourth S, social good, that is working to challenge the norms of the data economy and should be considered in research regarding the data economy moving forward.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications,Human-Computer Interaction,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Link

https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3579480

Reference66 articles.

1. Adriana Alvarado Garcia , Alyson L Young , and Lynn Dombrowski . 2017 . On making data actionable: How activists use imperfect data to foster social change for human rights violations in Mexico . Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction , Vol. 1 , CSCW (2017), 1--19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134654 10.1145/3134654 Adriana Alvarado Garcia, Alyson L Young, and Lynn Dombrowski. 2017. On making data actionable: How activists use imperfect data to foster social change for human rights violations in Mexico. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 1, CSCW (2017), 1--19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134654

2. Arjun Appadurai . 2006. Fear of small numbers . Duke University Press , Durham, NC, USA . Arjun Appadurai. 2006. Fear of small numbers. Duke University Press, Durham, NC, USA.

3. Elliot Aronson and Shelley Patnoe . 2010. Cooperation in the classroom: The jigsaw method. Pinter & Martin , London, UK . Elliot Aronson and Shelley Patnoe. 2010. Cooperation in the classroom: The jigsaw method. Pinter & Martin, London, UK.

4. This Is Shared Work;Asad Mariam;Negotiating Boundaries in a Social Service Intermediary Organization. Media and Communication,2019

5. Data journeys: Capturing the socio-material constitution of data objects and flows

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Data Introspection: An Embroidered PhD Trajectory in Unconventional Personal Data;Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction;2024-02-11

2. AI Gender Biases in Women’s Healthcare: Perspectives from the United Kingdom and the European Legal Space;YSEC Yearbook of Socio-Economic Constitutions;2023-12-08