Modeling Individual Fairness Beliefs and Its Applications

Author:

Zhang Chenglong1ORCID,Jacob Varghese S.2ORCID,Ryu Young U.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Management and Economics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China

2. Naveen Jindal School of Management, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, United States

Abstract

One of the criticisms made about data and algorithm-driven intelligent systems is that their results are viewed as being unfair or inequitable by individuals who believe in fairness criteria other than those embedded in the system design. In fact, computer and data scientists admit potential unfairness residing in intelligent systems. Accordingly, various approaches have been proposed to make intelligent systems fair. However, the consideration of a fundamental issue is missing in current efforts to design fair intelligent systems: Fairness is in the eye of the beholder . That is, the concept of fairness is very often highly subjective in most domains. Based on the premise that fairness is subjective, we propose a framework to represent and quantify individuals’ subjective fairness beliefs and provide methodologies to aggregate them. The proposed approach provides insight into how a population will assess the fairness of a decision or policy, which in turn can provide guidance for policy as well as designing intelligent systems.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Reference80 articles.

1. J. Abadie. 1978. The GRG method for nonlinear programming. In Design and Implementation of Optimization Software, H. J. Greenberg (Ed.). Springer, New York, 335–362.

2. Ahmed Abbasi Gari Clifford Herman Taylor and Jingjing Li. 2018. Make “fairness by design” part of machine learning. Harvard Business Review (digital article) August 1 2018. https://hbr.org/2018/08/make-fairness-by-design-part-of-machine-learning. (Accessed on July 22 2024).

3. Fairness in Context

4. Integrating behavioral, economic, and technical insights to understand and address algorithmic bias: A human-centric perspective;Adomavicius Gediminas;ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems,2022

5. Fairness and Redistribution

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3