Task-Based Information Interaction Evaluation

Author:

Järvelin Kalervo1,Vakkari Pertti1,Arvola Paavo1,Baskaya Feza1,Järvelin Anni1,Kekäläinen Jaana1,Keskustalo Heikki1,Kumpulainen Sanna1,Saastamoinen Miamaria1,Savolainen Reijo1,Sormunen Eero1

Affiliation:

1. University of Tampere, Finland

Abstract

Evaluation is central in research and development of information retrieval (IR). In addition to designing and implementing new retrieval mechanisms, one must also show through rigorous evaluation that they are effective. A major focus in IR is IR mechanisms’ capability of ranking relevant documents optimally for the users, given a query. Searching for information in practice involves searchers, however, and is highly interactive. When human searchers have been incorporated in evaluation studies, the results have often suggested that better ranking does not necessarily lead to better search task, or work task, performance. Therefore, it is not clear which system or interface features should be developed to improve the effectiveness of human task performance. In the present article, we focus on the evaluation of task-based information interaction (TBII). We give special emphasis to learning tasks to discuss TBII in more concrete terms. Information interaction is here understood as behavioral and cognitive activities related to task planning, searching information items, selecting between them, working with them, and synthesizing and reporting. These five generic activities contribute to task performance and outcome and can be supported by information systems. In an attempt toward task-based evaluation, we introduce program theory as the evaluation framework. Such evaluation can investigate whether a program consisting of TBII activities and tools works and how it works and, further, provides a causal description of program (in)effectiveness. Our goal in the present article is to structure TBII on the basis of the five generic activities and consider the evaluation of each activity using the program theory framework. Finally, we combine these activity-based program theories in an overall evaluation framework for TBII. Such an evaluation is complex due to the large number of factors affecting information interaction. Instead of presenting tested program theories, we illustrate how the evaluation of TBII should be accomplished using the program theory framework in the evaluation of systems and behaviors, and their interactions, comprehensively in context.

Funder

Academy of Finland

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Computer Science Applications,General Business, Management and Accounting,Information Systems

Reference121 articles.

1. A diary study of work-related reading

2. T. D. Anderson. 2006. Uncertainty in action: Observing information seeking within the creative processes of scholarly research. Inf. Res. 12 1 (2006) Article 283. T. D. Anderson. 2006. Uncertainty in action: Observing information seeking within the creative processes of scholarly research. Inf. Res. 12 1 (2006) Article 283.

3. Expected reading effort in focused retrieval evaluation

4. Contextualization models for XML retrieval

Cited by 48 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A Blueprint of IR Evaluation Integrating Task and User Characteristics;ACM Transactions on Information Systems;2024-07

2. Information searching in cultural heritage archives: a user study;Journal of Documentation;2024-04-09

3. Types of domain and task‐solving information in media scholars' data interaction;Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology;2023-12-26

4. Constructing and meta-evaluating state-aware evaluation metrics for interactive search systems;Information Retrieval Journal;2023-10-31

5. In a Perfect World: Exploring the Desires and Realities for Digitized Historical Image Archives;Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology;2023-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3