Stopping Methods for Technology-assisted Reviews Based on Point Processes

Author:

Stevenson Mark1ORCID,Bin-Hezam Reem2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Sheffield, United Kingdom

2. University of Sheffield, United Kingdom and Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Technology-assisted Review (TAR), which aims to reduce the effort required to screen collections of documents for relevance, is used to develop systematic reviews of medical evidence and identify documents that must be disclosed in response to legal proceedings. Stopping methods are algorithms that determine when to stop screening documents during the TAR process, helping to ensure that workload is minimised while still achieving a high level of recall. This article proposes a novel stopping method based on point processes, which are statistical models that can be used to represent the occurrence of random events. The approach uses rate functions to model the occurrence of relevant documents in the ranking and compares four candidates, including one that has not previously been used for this purpose (hyperbolic). Evaluation is carried out using standard datasets (CLEF e-Health, TREC Total Recall, TREC Legal), and this work is the first to explore stopping method robustness by reporting performance on a range of rankings of varying effectiveness. Results show that the proposed method achieves the desired level of recall without requiring an excessive number of documents to be examined in the majority of cases and also compares well against multiple alternative approaches.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Computer Science Applications,General Business, Management and Accounting,Information Systems

Reference70 articles.

1. Rapid diagnostic tests for diagnosing uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria in endemic countries;Abba Katharine;Cochrane Database System. Rev.,2011

2. Where to stop reading a ranked list?

3. Analysis of decline curves;Arps Jan J.;Trans. Amer. Inst. Min. Metal. Petrol. Eng.,1945

4. Query Hardness Estimation Using Jensen-Shannon Divergence Among Multiple Scoring Functions

5. A unified model for metasearch, pooling, and system evaluation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3