Affiliation:
1. CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security, Germany
2. Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford, U.K.
3. School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London, U.K.
Abstract
We study the complexity of approximating the number of answers to a small query
\(\varphi\)
in a large database
\(\mathcal{D}\)
. We establish an exhaustive classification into tractable and intractable cases if
\(\varphi\)
is a conjunctive query possibly including disequalities and negations:
If there is a constant bound on the arity of
\(\varphi\)
, and if the randomised Exponential Time Hypothesis (rETH) holds, then the problem has a fixed-parameter tractable approximation scheme (FPTRAS) if and only if the treewidth of
\(\varphi\)
is bounded.
If the arity is unbounded and
\(\varphi\)
does not have negations, then the problem has an FPTRAS if and only if the adaptive width of
\(\varphi\)
(a width measure strictly more general than treewidth) is bounded; the lower bound relies on the rETH as well.
Additionally we show that our results cannot be strengthened to achieve a fully polynomial randomised approximation scheme (FPRAS): We observe that, unless
\(\mathrm{NP}=\mathrm{RP}\)
, there is no FPRAS even if the treewidth (and the adaptive width) is
\(1\)
.
However, if there are neither disequalities nor negations, we prove the existence of an FPRAS for queries of bounded fractional hypertreewidth, strictly generalising the recently established FPRAS for conjunctive queries with bounded hypertreewidth due to Arenas, Croquevielle, Jayaram and Riveros (STOC 2021).
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Reference45 articles.
1. Serge Abiteboul, Richard Hull, and Victor Vianu. 1995. Foundations of Databases. Addison-Wesley. http://webdam.inria.fr/Alice/
2. Isolde Adler. 2006. Width functions for hypertree decompositions. Ph. D. Dissertation. Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.95.2257&rep=rep1&type=pdf
3. Query Languages for Data Exchange: Beyond Unions of Conjunctive Queries
4. When is approximate counting for conjunctive queries tractable?