Identify, Adapt, Persist

Author:

Lee Jarrett G.W.1ORCID,Lee Bongshin2ORCID,Choi Soyoung3ORCID,Seo JooYoung3ORCID,Choe Eun Kyoung1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Maryland, College Park, College Park, Maryland, USA

2. Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

3. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA

Abstract

Personal health technologies (PHTs) often do not consider the accessibility needs of blind individuals, preventing access to their capabilities and data. However, despite the accessibility barriers, some blind individuals persistently use such systems and even express satisfaction with them. To obtain a deeper understanding of blind users' prolonged experiences in PHTs, we interviewed 11 individuals who continue to use such technologies, discussing and observing their past and current interactions with their systems. We report on usability issues blind users encounter and how they adapt to these situations, and theories for the persistent use of PHTs in the face of poor accessibility. We reflect on strategies to improve the accessibility and usability of PHTs for blind users, as well as ideas to aid the normalization of accessible features within these systems.

Funder

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Reference73 articles.

1. Charkarra Anderson-Lewis, Gabrielle Darville, Rebeccah Eve Mercado, Savannah Howell, Samantha Di Maggio, et al. 2018. mHealth technology use and implications in historically underserved and minority populations in the United States: systematic literature review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 6, 6 (2018), e8383.

2. The Personal Health Technology Design Space

3. The Effects of "Not Knowing What You Don't Know" on Web Accessibility for Blind Web Users

4. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2021. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative research in psychology 18, 3 (2021), 328--352.

5. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2022. Thematic analysis: a practical guide. SAGE Publications Ltd, 85--88.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3