Quantitative Information Flow Techniques for Studying Optimality in Differential Privacy

Author:

Fernandes Natasha1

Affiliation:

1. Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia

Abstract

Universal optimality for differential privacy seeks to characterise the "best" mechanisms, which are the ones that provide the most utility to some class of consumers whilst simultaneously satisfying a fixed ε-differential privacy constraint. The study of universal optimality was initiated in 2009 in two important papers: the first by Ghosh et al., who discovered a universally optimal mechanism for a large class of consumers within the differential privacy constraint context of "counting queries" on statistical datasets; the second by Brenner and Nissim who found that outside of this context, no such universally optimal mechanisms exist. Since those remarkable results, there have been few advances in this field. In this article we detail some recent work which sheds new light on these results using Quantitative Information Flow (QIF), a mathematical framework for quantifying information leaks under a Bayesian adversarial model. Using standard QIF reasoning we show how the earlier results can be both generalised and extended, opening up new avenues for exploring optimality in a wide variety of differential privacy contexts.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference24 articles.

1. The U.S. Census Bureau Adopts Differential Privacy

2. Jayadev Acharya , Kallista Bonawitz , Peter Kairouz , Daniel Ramage , and Ziteng Sun . 2020 . Context aware local differential privacy . In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 52--62 . Jayadev Acharya, Kallista Bonawitz, Peter Kairouz, Daniel Ramage, and Ziteng Sun. 2020. Context aware local differential privacy. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 52--62.

3. Mário S Alvim Konstantinos Chatzikokolakis Annabelle McIver Carroll Morgan Catuscia Palamidessi and Geoffrey Smith. 2019. The Science of Quantitative Information Flow. (2019). Mário S Alvim Konstantinos Chatzikokolakis Annabelle McIver Carroll Morgan Catuscia Palamidessi and Geoffrey Smith. 2019. The Science of Quantitative Information Flow. (2019).

4. Geo-indistinguishability

5. Impossibility of Differentially Private Universally Optimal Mechanisms

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3