Affiliation:
1. University of Puget Sound
2. Google, Inc.
3. Stanford University
Abstract
A diversity of user goals and strategies make creation-oriented applications such as word processors or photo-editors difficult to comprehensively test. Evaluating such applications requires testing a large pool of participants to capture the diversity of experience, but traditional usability testing can be prohibitively expensive. To address this problem, this article contributes a new usability evaluation method called backtracking analysis, designed to automate the process of detecting and characterizing usability problems in creation-oriented applications. The key insight is that interaction breakdowns in creation-oriented applications often manifest themselves in backtracking operations that can be automatically logged (e.g., undo and erase operations). Backtracking analysis synchronizes these events to contextual data such as screen capture video, helping the evaluator to characterize specific usability problems. The results from three experiments demonstrate that backtracking events can be effective indicators of usability problems in creation-oriented applications, and can yield a cost-effective alternative to traditional laboratory usability testing.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Subject
Human-Computer Interaction
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Predicting interaction effort in web interface widgets;International Journal of Human-Computer Studies;2022-12
2. Predicting Interaction Effort in Web Interface Widgets;SSRN Electronic Journal;2022
3. CHAI: Coding Heuristics for Assessing Intuitive Interaction;Design, User Experience, and Usability: Theory and Practice;2018
4. Usability Testing;The Wiley Handbook of Human Computer Interaction;2017-12-28
5. The entangled strands of time in software development;Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGPLAN International Workshop on Programming Experience;2017-10-22