Exact Model Counting of Query Expressions

Author:

Beame Paul1,Li Jerry2,Roy Sudeepa3,Suciu Dan1

Affiliation:

1. University of Washington, WA, USA

2. MIT, MA, USA

3. Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

Abstract

We prove exponential lower bounds on the running time of the state-of-the-art exact model counting algorithms—algorithms for exactly computing the number of satisfying assignments, or the satisfying probability, of Boolean formulas. These algorithms can be seen, either directly or indirectly, as building Decision-Decomposable Negation Normal Form (decision-DNNF) representations of the input Boolean formulas. Decision-DNNFs are a special case of d -DNNFs where d stands for deterministic . We show that any knowledge compilation representations from a class (called DLDDs in this article) that contain decision-DNNFs can be converted into equivalent Free Binary Decision Diagrams (FBDDs) , also known as Read-Once Branching Programs , with only a quasi-polynomial increase in representation size. Leveraging known exponential lower bounds for FBDDs, we then obtain similar exponential lower bounds for decision-DNNFs, which imply exponential lower bounds for model-counting algorithms. We also separate the power of decision-DNNFs from d -DNNFs and a generalization of decision-DNNFs known as AND-FBDDs. We then prove new lower bounds for FBDDs that yield exponential lower bounds on the running time of these exact model counters when applied to the problem of query evaluation in tuple-independent probabilistic databases—computing the probability of an answer to a query given independent probabilities of the individual tuples in a database instance. This approach to the query evaluation problem, in which one first obtains the lineage for the query and database instance as a Boolean formula and then performs weighted model counting on the lineage, is known as grounded inference . A second approach, known as lifted inference or extensional query evaluation , exploits the high-level structure of the query as a first-order formula. Although it has been widely believed that lifted inference is strictly more powerful than grounded inference on the lineage alone, no formal separation has previously been shown for query evaluation. In this article, we show such a formal separation for the first time. In particular, we exhibit a family of database queries for which polynomial-time extensional query evaluation techniques were previously known but for which query evaluation via grounded inference using the state-of-the-art exact model counters requires exponential time.

Funder

NSF

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Information Systems

Reference41 articles.

1. Binary Decision Diagrams

2. Fahiem Bacchus Shannon Dalmao and Toniann Pitassi. 2003. Algorithms and complexity results for #SAT and Bayesian inference. In FOCS. 340--351. Fahiem Bacchus Shannon Dalmao and Toniann Pitassi. 2003. Algorithms and complexity results for #SAT and Bayesian inference. In FOCS. 340--351.

3. Roberto J. Bayardo Jr. and J. D. Pehoushek. 2000. Counting models using connected components. In AAAI. 157--162. Roberto J. Bayardo Jr. and J. D. Pehoushek. 2000. Counting models using connected components. In AAAI. 157--162.

4. Formula Caching in DPLL

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Chapter 6. Tractable Boolean and Arithmetic Circuits;Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications;2021-12-22

2. A compositional approach to probabilistic knowledge compilation;International Journal of Approximate Reasoning;2021-11

3. Solving a Special Case of the Intensional vs Extensional Conjecture in Probabilistic Databases;Proceedings of the 39th ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGAI Symposium on Principles of Database Systems;2020-05-29

4. Probabilistic Databases for All;Proceedings of the 39th ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGAI Symposium on Principles of Database Systems;2020-05-29

5. Connecting Knowledge Compilation Classes Width Parameters;Theory of Computing Systems;2019-06-10

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3