Convening a Minipublic During a Pandemic: A Case Study of the Oregon Citizens’ Assembly Pilot on COVID-19 Recovery

Author:

Gastil John1ORCID,Anderson Chris2ORCID,Black Laura3ORCID,Burkhalter Stephanie4ORCID,Han Soo-Hye5ORCID,Reedy Justin6ORCID,Richards Robert7ORCID,Rountree John8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Departments of Communication Arts & Sciences and Political Science and Senior Scholar at the McCourtney Institute for Democracy, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA

2. Department of Communication, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK

3. Department of Communication Studies, Ohio University, Athens, OH

4. Department of Politics, California State Polytechnic University, Humboldt, Arcata, CA

5. Department of English, Tsuda University, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan

6. Department of Communication and Research Associate in the Institute for Public Policy Research & Analysis, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK

7. Clinton School of Public Service, University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR

8. Department of Arts & Communication, University of Houston-Downtown, Houston, TX

Abstract

From July–August, 2020, the nonprofit organization Healthy Democracy convened a seven-week pilot test of an online Citizen Assembly on the state of Oregon's response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This pilot project presented a unique research opportunity, because its organizers had ten years of experience running the Citizens’ Initiative Review, a face-to-face minipublic authorized by the State of Oregon to write voting guides for the wider electorate on ballot measures. This case study compares survey data from the Citizen Assembly pilot with the prior Citizens’ Initiative Reviews and provides analysis and recommendations that could improve the design and execution of future online assemblies.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Public Administration,Software,Information Systems,Computer Science Applications,Computer Networks and Communications

Reference27 articles.

1. Assessing the policy impacts of deliberative civic engagement in the health policy processes of Brazil and Canada;Barrett Gregory;Democracy in Motion: Evaluating the Practice and Impact of Deliberative Civic Engagement,2012

2. Methods for analyzing and measuring group deliberation;Black Laura W.;Sourcebook for Political Communication Research: Methods, Measures, and Analytical Techniques,2011

3. Building faith in democracy: Deliberative events, political trust, and efficacy;Boulianne Shelley;Political Studies,2018

4. DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRATIC THEORY

5. Improving deliberative participation: Connecting mini-publics to deliberative systems;Andrea Felicetti;Eur. Politic. Sci. Rev.,2016

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3