Affiliation:
1. TPM, TU Delft, Delft, Netherlands
2. TPM, TU Delft, Delft Netherlands
Abstract
The AI Act represents a significant legislative effort by the European Union to govern the use of AI systems according to different risk-related classes, imposing different degrees of compliance obligations to users and providers of AI systems. However, it is often critiqued due to the lack of general public comprehension and effectiveness regarding the classification of AI systems to the corresponding risk classes. To mitigate these shortcomings, we propose a Decision-Tree-based framework aimed at increasing legal compliance and classification clarity. By performing a quantitative evaluation, we show that our framework is especially beneficial to individuals without a legal background, allowing them to enhance the accuracy and speed of AI system classification according to the AI Act. The qualitative study results show that the framework is helpful to all participants, allowing them to justify intuitively made decisions and making the classification process clearer.
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Reference44 articles.
1. Sushant Agarwal, Sabrina Kirrane, and Johannes Scharf. 2017. Modelling the General Data Protection Regulation. Internationales Rechtsinformatik Symposion IRIS (2017).
2. Legislative Compliance Assessment: Framework, Model and GDPR Instantiation
3. Questioning the EU proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Act: The need for prohibitions and a stricter approach to biometric surveillance1
4. Matching and Prediction on the Principle of Biological Classification
5. Michael Chui Eric Hazan Roger Roberts Alex Singla Kate Smaje Alex Sukharevsky Lareina Yee and Rodney Zemmel. 2023. The Economic Potential of Generative AI: The Next Productivity Frontier. Retrieved 2024-03-11 from https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/the-economic-potential-of-generative-ai-the-next-productivity-frontier