How well do line drawings depict shape?

Author:

Cole Forrester1,Sanik Kevin2,DeCarlo Doug2,Finkelstein Adam1,Funkhouser Thomas1,Rusinkiewicz Szymon3,Singh Manish2

Affiliation:

1. Princeton University

2. Rutgers University

3. Princeton University and Adobe Systems

Abstract

This paper investigates the ability of sparse line drawings to depict 3D shape. We perform a study in which people are shown an image of one of twelve 3D objects depicted with one of six styles and asked to orient a gauge to coincide with the surface normal at many positions on the object's surface. The normal estimates are compared with each other and with ground truth data provided by a registered 3D surface model to analyze accuracy and precision. The paper describes the design decisions made in collecting a large data set (275,000 gauge measurements) and provides analysis to answer questions about how well people interpret shapes from drawings. Our findings suggest that people interpret certain shapes almost as well from a line drawing as from a shaded image, that current computer graphics line drawing techniques can effectively depict shape and even match the effectiveness of artist's drawings, and that errors in depiction are often localized and can be traced to particular properties of the lines used. The data collected for this study will become a publicly available resource for further studies of this type.

Funder

Division of Computing and Communication Foundations

Division of Information and Intelligent Systems

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design

Cited by 119 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Region‐Aware Simplification and Stylization of 3D Line Drawings;Computer Graphics Forum;2024-04-24

2. An accidental image feature that appears but not disappears;Journal of Mathematical Psychology;2024-04

3. New Insights in Smooth Occluding Contours for Nonphotorealistic Rendering;IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications;2024-01

4. A Semi-Automatic Oriental Ink Painting Framework for Robotic Drawing From 3D Models;IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters;2023-10

5. Drawing as a versatile cognitive tool;Nature Reviews Psychology;2023-07-17

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3