When Measurement Misleads

Author:

Zobel Justin1

Affiliation:

1. The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Abstract

The discipline of information retrieval (IR) has a long history of examination of how best to measure performance. In particular, there is an extensive literature on the practice of assessing retrieval systems using batch experiments based on collections and relevance judgements. However, this literature has only rarely considered an underlying principle: that measured scores are inherently incomplete as a representation of human activity, that is, there is an innate gap between measured scores and the desired goal of human satisfaction. There are separate challenges such as poor experimental practices or the shortcomings of specific measures, but the issue considered here is more fundamental - straightforwardly, in batch experiments the human-machine gap cannot be closed. In other disciplines, the issue of the gap is well recognised and has been the subject of observations that provide valuable perspectives on the behaviour and effects of measures and the ways in which they can lead to unintended consequences, notably Goodhart's law and the Lucas critique. Here I describe these observations and argue that there is evidence that they apply to IR, thus showing that blind pursuit of performance gains based on optimisation of scores, and analysis based solely on aggregated measurements, can lead to misleading and unreliable outcomes.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Hardware and Architecture,Management Information Systems

Reference46 articles.

1. Improvements that don't add up

2. User Variability and IR System Evaluation

3. F. G. Boudinot and J. Wilson . Does a proxy measure up? A framework to assess and convey proxy reliability. Climate Past, 16 , 2020 . doi: 0.5194/cp-16-1807-2020. F. G. Boudinot and J. Wilson. Does a proxy measure up? A framework to assess and convey proxy reliability. Climate Past, 16, 2020. doi: 0.5194/cp-16-1807-2020.

4. Using massive online choice experiments to measure changes in well-being

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Simulating Users in Interactive Web Table Retrieval;Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management;2023-10-21

2. The Information Retrieval Experiment Platform;Proceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval;2023-07-18

3. Report on the Dagstuhl Seminar on Frontiers of Information Access Experimentation for Research and Education;ACM SIGIR Forum;2023-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3