A Functional Classification of Forensic Access to Storage and its Legal Implications

Author:

Hammer Andreas1ORCID,Ohlig Mathis2ORCID,Geus Julian1ORCID,Freiling Felix1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. IT Security Infrastructures Lab, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Germany

2. Lehrstuhl für Strafrecht, Strafprozessrecht und Rechtsphilosophie, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Germany

Abstract

Due to their ease of use and their reliability, managed storage services in the cloud have become a standard way to store files for many users. Consequently, data from cloud storage services and remote file systems in general is an increasingly valuable source of digital evidence in forensic investigations. In this respect, two questions appear relevant: (1) What effect does data acquisition by the client have on the data stored on the server? (2) Does the technology support delayed verification of data acquisition? The two questions refer to critical aspects of forensic evidence collection, namely, in what way does evidence collection interfere with the evidence, and how easy is it to prove the provenance of data in a forensic investigation. We formalize the above questions and use this formalization to classify common storage services. We argue that this classification has direct consequences with regard to the probative value of data acquired from them. We, therefore, discuss the legal implications of this classification with regard to probative value so that IT expert witnesses can adapt their procedures during evidence acquisition and legal practitioners know how to assess such procedures and the evidence obtained through them from cloud storage services.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications,Computer Science Applications,Hardware and Architecture,Safety Research,Information Systems,Software

Reference32 articles.

1. A forensic analysis of rclone and rclone's prospects for digital forensic investigations of cloud storage

2. Regine Büter, German Engst, Kai Esser, Felix Freiling, Kay Friedrich, Tim Friedrich, Andreas Hammer, Lukas Heine, Lukas Heinlein, Oliver Korn, Christian Minuth, Manuel Müller, Nico Müller, Juliane Reithmeier, Nora Ripley, Matti Schulze, Merlin Sievers, Charinee Srikhaolan, and Johan Zenk. 2022. A Comparison of Cloud Storage Technologies as Sources of Digital Evidence. Technical Report CS-2022-01. Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Department of Computer Science. Retrieved from https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bvb:29-opus4-210457

3. Eoghan Casey. 2011. Digital Evidence and Computer Crime—Forensic Science, Computers and the Internet, 3rd Edition. Academic Press. Retrieved from http://www.elsevierdirect.com/product.jsp?isbn=9780123742681

4. David Coulter Michael Satran and Drew Batchelor. 2021. Microsoft SMB protocol and CIFS Protocol Overview. Retrieved from https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/microsoft-smb-protocol-and-cifs-protocol-overview. (Jan.2021). part of Windows 2000 Web and Application Services Technical Overview.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3