Fairness in Recommendation: Foundations, Methods, and Applications

Author:

Li Yunqi1ORCID,Chen Hanxiong1ORCID,Xu Shuyuan1ORCID,Ge Yingqiang1ORCID,Tan Juntao1ORCID,Liu Shuchang1ORCID,Zhang Yongfeng1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Rutgers University, USA

Abstract

As one of the most pervasive applications of machine learning, recommender systems are playing an important role on assisting human decision-making. The satisfaction of users and the interests of platforms are closely related to the quality of the generated recommendation results. However, as a highly data-driven system, recommender system could be affected by data or algorithmic bias and thus generate unfair results, which could weaken the reliance of the systems. As a result, it is crucial to address the potential unfairness problems in recommendation settings. Recently, there has been growing attention on fairness considerations in recommender systems with more and more literature on approaches to promote fairness in recommendation. However, the studies are rather fragmented and lack a systematic organization, thus making it difficult to penetrate for new researchers to the domain. This motivates us to provide a systematic survey of existing works on fairness in recommendation. This survey focuses on the foundations for fairness in recommendation literature. It first presents a brief introduction about fairness in basic machine learning tasks such as classification and ranking to provide a general overview of fairness research, as well as introduce the more complex situations and challenges that need to be considered when studying fairness in recommender systems. After that, the survey will introduce fairness in recommendation with a focus on the taxonomies of current fairness definitions, the typical techniques for improving fairness, as well as the datasets for fairness studies in recommendation. The survey also talks about the challenges and opportunities in fairness research with the hope of promoting the fair recommendation research area and beyond.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Theoretical Computer Science

Reference262 articles.

1. 2022. Retrieved from https://data36.com/statistical-bias-types-explained/

2. Himan Abdollahpouri and Robin Burke. 2019. Multi-stakeholder recommendation and its connection to multi-sided fairness. In Proceedings of the RMSE Workshop Held in Conjunction with the 13th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems.

3. Himan Abdollahpouri, Robin Burke, and Bamshad Mobasher. 2017. Controlling popularity bias in learning-to-rank recommendation. In RecSys. 42–46.

4. Managing popularity bias in recommender systems with personalized re-ranking;Abdollahpouri Himan;arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.07555,2019

5. The unfairness of popularity bias in recommendation;Abdollahpouri Himan;arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.13286,2019

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3