Understanding Cultural Influence on Perspectives Around Contact Tracing Strategies

Author:

Lu Xi1,Jo Eunkyung1,Park Seora2,Hong Hwajung3,Chen Yunan1,Epstein Daniel A.1

Affiliation:

1. University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA

2. Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

3. KAIST, Deajeon, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Contact tracing, a major way to curb COVID-19 and other epidemics, has been employed worldwide, with human interviewing and proximity tracing technology as two major approaches. While previous research has contributed some understanding of people's perspectives on contact tracing technology, much of this is based in single countries or regions where technology has been deployed. To understand how culture influences people's perceptions toward human tracing and digital tracing, we replicated a mixed-methods survey study conducted in the U.S. in South Korea and compared participants' perspectives. South Korean participants preferred digital tracing to human tracing, contrasting with the U.S. context where no strong preference was observed. We discuss how observed differences in perspective align and contrast with the country's typical cultural dimensions, such as high power distance, informing the perspective that human tracing will have greater accuracy. We emphasize the need for culturally designing contact tracing technology to highlight personal benefits regardless of cultural dimensions, and leverage technology to support social interaction in human tracing.

Funder

Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea

NSF

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications,Human-Computer Interaction,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Reference94 articles.

1. Community health volunteers’ contribution to tuberculosis patients notified to National Tuberculosis program through contact investigation in Kenya

2. Website Design Guidelines: High Power Distance and High Context Culture;Ahmed Tanveer;International Journal of Cyber Society and Education,2009

3. We need to talk about digital contact tracing

4. Samuel Altmann , Luke Milsom , Hannah Zillessen , Raffaele Blasone , Frederic Gerdon , Ruben Bach , Frauke Kreuter , Daniele Nosenzo , Séverine Toussaert , and Johannes Abeler . 2020. Acceptability of App-Based Contact Tracing for COVID-19: Cross-Country Survey Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 8, 8 (Aug 2020 ), e19857. https://doi.org/10.2196/19857 10.2196/19857 Samuel Altmann, Luke Milsom, Hannah Zillessen, Raffaele Blasone, Frederic Gerdon, Ruben Bach, Frauke Kreuter, Daniele Nosenzo, Séverine Toussaert, and Johannes Abeler. 2020. Acceptability of App-Based Contact Tracing for COVID-19: Cross-Country Survey Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 8, 8 (Aug 2020), e19857. https://doi.org/10.2196/19857

5. Digital Contact Tracing Technologies in Epidemics: a Rapid Review;Anglemyer Andrew;Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,2020

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3