Reactions to Fact Checking-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Reactions to Fact Checking

Published:2022-11-07 Issue:CSCW2 Volume:6 Page:1-17
ISSN:2573-0142
Container-title:Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
language:en
Short-container-title:Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact.

Author:

Appling Scott¹,Bruckman Amy¹,De Choudhury Munmun¹

Affiliation:

1. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA

Abstract

How do the reasons people post misinformation affect how they respond to fact checking interventions? In this research, we conducted a qualitative study of people who shared misinformation. We started with stories marked as false by a popular fact checker, Snopes, and identified people who posted those stories on Reddit. We interviewed the posters about the story they shared and their five behaviorally distinct personas: Reason to Disagree, Changed Belief, Steadfast Non-Standard Belief, Sharing to Debunk, and Sharing for Humor. Our findings suggest that research to craft better interventions to counter misinformation might benefit from tailoring to specific personas that can serve as design tools for on-going misinformation intervention research.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)

Subject

Computer Networks and Communications,Human-Computer Interaction,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Link

https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3555128

Reference49 articles.

1. Imaginary People Representing Real Numbers

2. Designing to Support Reflection on Values & Practices to Address Online Disinformation

3. Richard D Ashmore , Kay Deaux , and Tracy McLaughlin-Volpe . 2004. An organizing framework for collective identity: articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological bulletin , Vol. 130 , 1 ( 2004 ), 80. Richard D Ashmore, Kay Deaux, and Tracy McLaughlin-Volpe. 2004. An organizing framework for collective identity: articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological bulletin, Vol. 130, 1 (2004), 80.

4. Mahmoudreza Babaei , Abhijnan Chakraborty , Juhi Kulshrestha , Elissa M. Redmiles , Meeyoung Cha , and Krishna P. Gummadi . 2019. Analyzing Biases in Perception of Truth in News Stories and Their Implications for Fact Checking . In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency ( Atlanta, GA, USA) (FAT* '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 139. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287581 10.1145/3287560.3287581 Mahmoudreza Babaei, Abhijnan Chakraborty, Juhi Kulshrestha, Elissa M. Redmiles, Meeyoung Cha, and Krishna P. Gummadi. 2019. Analyzing Biases in Perception of Truth in News Stories and Their Implications for Fact Checking. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Atlanta, GA, USA) (FAT* '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 139. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287581

5. Snopes;Band Barbara;The School Librarian,2020

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Promise and Peril of ChatGPT in Higher Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and Design Implications;Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems;2024-05-11

2. "Fact-checks are for the Top 0.1%": Examining Reach, Awareness, and Relevance of Fact-Checking in Rural India;Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction;2024-04-17

3. "The Headline Was So Wild That I Had To Check": An Exploration of Women's Encounters With Health Misinformation on Social Media;Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction;2024-04-17

4. A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Women’s Health Misinformation on Social Media;Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2023;2023